2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-84042004000100017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reavaliação das características morfológicas e suas implicações taxonômicas no gênero Polysiphonia sensu lato (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) do litoral dos Estados de São Paulo e Espírito Santo, Brasil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
2
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This transfer was based on observations of material from Brazil, which may have been misidentified because the specimens were reported to show traits (trichoblasts on every segment: see Oliveira Filho, 1969, pl 23, fig. 136; Guimarães et al, 2004) that do not match either our observations of the type material of P. tepida or the descriptions provided by other authors for collections from Atlantic North America (Hollenberg, 1958;Kapraun, 1977;Schneider & Searles, 1991, fig. 558; Dawes & Mathieson, 2008;Mamoozadeh & Freshwater, 2011).…”
Section: Habitat and Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This transfer was based on observations of material from Brazil, which may have been misidentified because the specimens were reported to show traits (trichoblasts on every segment: see Oliveira Filho, 1969, pl 23, fig. 136; Guimarães et al, 2004) that do not match either our observations of the type material of P. tepida or the descriptions provided by other authors for collections from Atlantic North America (Hollenberg, 1958;Kapraun, 1977;Schneider & Searles, 1991, fig. 558; Dawes & Mathieson, 2008;Mamoozadeh & Freshwater, 2011).…”
Section: Habitat and Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The transfer of Polysiphonia tepida to Neosiphonia by Guimarães et al (2004) is questionable on the basis of our data. This transfer was based on observations of material from Brazil, which may have been misidentified because the specimens were reported to show traits (trichoblasts on every segment: see Oliveira Filho, 1969, pl 23, fig.…”
Section: Habitat and Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coletas de macroalgas realizadas em substratos consolidados naturais da região sublitorânea rasa da Baía de Sepetiba e adjacências, RJ, Brasil: locais, coordenadas, datas, níveis do costão, e classificação quanto à prioridade para o levantamento de espécies introduzidas, segundo o Procedimento CRIMP: 2 -prioridade intermediária, com razoável possibilidade de acolher espécies introduzidas, devido à pouca distância para os locais de despejo de água de lastro; 4 -prioridade mínima, com a menor possibilidade de acolher espécies introduzidas. (Guimarães et al 2004). Para determinados táxons, houve confirmação da identificação por especialistas (Tab.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…dentata [20], Hypnea cerviconus/Hypnea spinella [34], H. musiformes [46], Griffithsia schousboei [48], Lawrencia majuscula [49], Lithothamnia sp. [50], Lobophora variegata [51], Padina antillarum [52], P. durvillei [53], P. ferulacea/Neosiphonia ferulacea [54] R. expansa [22], S. vulgare [22], U. fasciata/Ulva lactuca [55].…”
Section: Species Composition and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%