1997
DOI: 10.2172/453736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reassessment of selected factors affecting siting of Nuclear Power Plants

Abstract: Brookhaven National Laboratory has performed a series of probabilistic consequence assessment calculations for nuclear reactor siting. This study takes into account recent insights into severe accident source terms and examines consequences in a risk based format consistent with the quantitative health objectives (QHOs) of the NRC's Safety Goal Policy.Simplified severe accident source terms developedin this study are based on the risk insights of NUREG-1150. The results of the study indicate that both the quan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) performed a set of studies of probabilistic consequence assessment calculations for nuclear reactor siting [8]. This study considered (i) the insights into severe accident source terms that were gained in the NUREG-U50 study [9], (ii) the advances in the models of the health and safety of radiation embodied in a newer consequence models, and (iii) an examination of accident consequences in a risk based format consistent with the quantitative health objectives of the NRC's Safety Goal Policy [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) performed a set of studies of probabilistic consequence assessment calculations for nuclear reactor siting [8]. This study considered (i) the insights into severe accident source terms that were gained in the NUREG-U50 study [9], (ii) the advances in the models of the health and safety of radiation embodied in a newer consequence models, and (iii) an examination of accident consequences in a risk based format consistent with the quantitative health objectives of the NRC's Safety Goal Policy [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%