2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reassessing the principles of electrical stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
69
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the muscle post-mortem changes can be explained in terms of muscle stimulation by the electrical current, causing the muscle contraction and trigging metabolic processes that accelerate the progress of rigor. This is not surprising when we consider that the electric stimulation can be used to shorten the pre-rigor period in terrestrial animals (Simmons et al 2008). Erikson et al (2012) reported that electrical stunning method applied in air (107 V rms 0.5+0.2 A rms for 0.5 or 15 s) did not affect cod quality, at least not to different extents, apart from some minor (but significant) differences related to the eyes and skin.…”
Section: Quality Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The differences in the muscle post-mortem changes can be explained in terms of muscle stimulation by the electrical current, causing the muscle contraction and trigging metabolic processes that accelerate the progress of rigor. This is not surprising when we consider that the electric stimulation can be used to shorten the pre-rigor period in terrestrial animals (Simmons et al 2008). Erikson et al (2012) reported that electrical stunning method applied in air (107 V rms 0.5+0.2 A rms for 0.5 or 15 s) did not affect cod quality, at least not to different extents, apart from some minor (but significant) differences related to the eyes and skin.…”
Section: Quality Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Following splitting of the carcass, trimmed side weights were recorded. Within 45 min of exsanguination HVES (400 V peak, 5 ms pulses at 15 pulses s −1 for 30 s; Simmons et al 2008) was applied to the right sides. Immediately following stimulation, an initial (1 h) pH and temperature was recorded posterior to the grade site on both left and right longissimus lumborum (LL) using a Hanna HI99163 pH meter equipped with a Hanna Smart electrode for meat (model #FC232; Hanna Instruments, Laval, QC, Canada).…”
Section: Animal Selection and Slaughtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical stimulation prevents cold toughening after slaughter by accelerating the pH fall (24 h pH = 5.56 vs. 5.67 for stimulated and control carcass sides, respectively, P < 0.001) and, consequently, reduces the need for an extended aging process to resolve the rigor contraction (Simmons et al 2008). Calpain-induced proteolysis and physical muscle damage have also been suggested as part of the mechanism involved with the lower shear force values observed in meat from electrically stimulated beef (Dransfield 1992; Huff-Lonergan et al 1995; Koohmaraie 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of electrical stimulation on meat tenderness can be explained by several mechanisms, including prevention of cold toughening by faster postmortem pH drop, calpain-induced proteolysis, and physical muscle damage (Dransfield 1992;Huff-Lonergan et al 1995;Koohmaraie 1996;Simmons et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%