2005
DOI: 10.4324/9780203412923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reassessing Gender and Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
118
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
118
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The gender debate centres largely on the underachievement of boys and has provoked considerable media and policy attention and is increasingly identified as an international issue (see, for example Francis 1999;Francis and Skelton 2005;OECD 2007). However, the gender focus has also been contested (see for example, Epstein et al 1998;Gorard et al 1999;Connolly 2006aConnolly , 2006b as analysts have questioned the validity of the focus on gender in educational attainment, arguing that factors such as 'race' and social class have a stronger impact on educational attainment than does gender (Archer and Francis 2007).…”
Section: Educational Attainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gender debate centres largely on the underachievement of boys and has provoked considerable media and policy attention and is increasingly identified as an international issue (see, for example Francis 1999;Francis and Skelton 2005;OECD 2007). However, the gender focus has also been contested (see for example, Epstein et al 1998;Gorard et al 1999;Connolly 2006aConnolly , 2006b as analysts have questioned the validity of the focus on gender in educational attainment, arguing that factors such as 'race' and social class have a stronger impact on educational attainment than does gender (Archer and Francis 2007).…”
Section: Educational Attainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the issue of the influence of gender on academic achievement and self-concept, Francis and Skelton (2005) explain that how students are encouraged or discouraged in school subjects may be based on learning opportunities. Male students tend to receive more encouragement in sciences while females are nurtured more in arts.…”
Section: Review Of Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereotype becomes a problem when forces in schools and the society limit the academic potential of either male or female. According to Francis and Skelton (2005) and Wessel (2005), gender stereotypic views create negative influence on children in their choice of career decision, and females are less likely to study engineering and computer sciences than males. Therefore, there are some indications that gender stereotype can influence individuals' academic perceptions and achievement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption has been joined by the prevalent concern over boys' underachievement and has led to a call by some politicians for more male teachers to act as 'role models' for boys as a means to improve attainment, a call which has been criticised for its essentialist approach to gender and its disregard of the complex intersectional effects of 'race', class and gender upon school success (Francis and Skelton, 2005;Younger, Warrington and McLellan, 2005). Thus, the focus on gender was considered important as a means to understand the (predominantly 13 female) students' views on the likely impact upon recruitment procedures of policy-level concerns over the 'lack' of male teachers within primary teaching (Dermott, 2011).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%