2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reassessing advance care planning in the light of covid-19

Abstract: Focus on creating a shared narrative not recording choices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the pandemic response also opens up new opportunities for developing nurse roles in community settings, streamlining care, learning from what has worked well and reformulating collaborative working in the future (Green, 2020). COVID-19 has heightened awareness of the potential benefits of advance care planning when conversations are timely and sensitive to the priorities and concerns of the patient and those important to them (Hopkins et al, 2020; Queen's Nursing Institute (QNI), 2020). However, nurses working in the community report feeling ill-prepared to lead end-of-life care planning conversations and frequently describe learning these skills through experience, including trial and error (Griffiths et al, 2015a;Hadley, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the pandemic response also opens up new opportunities for developing nurse roles in community settings, streamlining care, learning from what has worked well and reformulating collaborative working in the future (Green, 2020). COVID-19 has heightened awareness of the potential benefits of advance care planning when conversations are timely and sensitive to the priorities and concerns of the patient and those important to them (Hopkins et al, 2020; Queen's Nursing Institute (QNI), 2020). However, nurses working in the community report feeling ill-prepared to lead end-of-life care planning conversations and frequently describe learning these skills through experience, including trial and error (Griffiths et al, 2015a;Hadley, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(43) This is a concern raised by the public and clinical communities. (43,48,49) Considerations for clinical practice and policy COVID-19 has provided an opportunity to re-think ACP in which the starting point to any discussion is always the values and priorities of patients themselves. Initially, these discussions are likely to be broad in nature, with their focus then narrowing in line with the more immediate concerns of individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because ACP is a multi-component process, not a one-time event/document, not least because preferences and priorities may change. (6-8, 10, 12, 34, 43-46) Delivering all of the multiple components of ACP, and delivering them well, is important to ensure inclusive, holistic, and individualised care that focuses on what matters most to patients. (47) Whilst understandable in the pandemic context, emphasis on discrete components of ACP may jeopardise the individualised and holistic qualities essential for the delivery of high quality and comprehensive ACP, and runs the risk of making ACP a ‘tick box exercise focused on a predetermined list of preferences’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential that good care planning be undertaken to ensure that patients can choose which treatments they will receive from the menu of those that are available and most appropriate, even during the pandemic. Proactive planning and advance treatment arrangements should be a standard component of care provided by neurologists and primary care physicians [38]. However, after over 2 years from the passage of the Italian Law 219/2017, the implementation of ACP is very limited [39].…”
Section: Reflecting On Neurological Preparednessmentioning
confidence: 99%