2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reassembling nature and culture: Resourceful farming in Araponga, Brazil

Abstract: Leonardo van den Berg worked for ILEA, an independent NGO working on agroecology and family farming. He is now a full-time PhD student at Wageningen University.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Zona da Mata, farmers categorised as agroecological, who in the past were either landless, conventional or traditional family farmers, were part of a social movement and a network that brought together farmers, church-based organisations, local NGOs (CTA), the Federal University of Viçosa, and other organisations [12] (Table 1 and Figure 3). Through this movement, they were able to contest the mainstream discourse of the Green Revolution and construct an alternative agroecological discourse that recognises farmers' own knowledge and resources [11]. Through this movement, traditional practices were revalued and new agroecological practices constructed through on-farm experiments, participatory research and peasant-to-peasant learning exchanges [12,31].…”
Section: Farm Diversity and Implications For Agroecological Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Zona da Mata, farmers categorised as agroecological, who in the past were either landless, conventional or traditional family farmers, were part of a social movement and a network that brought together farmers, church-based organisations, local NGOs (CTA), the Federal University of Viçosa, and other organisations [12] (Table 1 and Figure 3). Through this movement, they were able to contest the mainstream discourse of the Green Revolution and construct an alternative agroecological discourse that recognises farmers' own knowledge and resources [11]. Through this movement, traditional practices were revalued and new agroecological practices constructed through on-farm experiments, participatory research and peasant-to-peasant learning exchanges [12,31].…”
Section: Farm Diversity and Implications For Agroecological Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the farm level, agroecology favours practices based on multi-functionality and biodiversity to reduce the dependence on external agrochemical inputs and to enhance ecological processes [9,10]. Agroecological practices are knowledge intensive and tailored to local ecological conditions and cultural knowledge [11,12]. Agroecological practices can be technically oriented, such as composting or biocontrol and/or more socially oriented and promote, for instance, gender equality or local culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workers often lived in poor conditions, were subjected to the orders of the landlords and had little autonomy. Within decades, diverse social dynamics in the region led to the division of land, mainly through heritage and land acquisition by rural workers (Valverde, 1958;Van den Berg et al, 2018). Governmental policies in the 1960`s encouraged farmers to intensify coffee production by establishing monocultures and increased use of external inputs, such as pesticides and fertilizers, based on the green revolution model.…”
Section: Agroecological Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…courses on homeopathy, use and maintenance of rural equipment, pruning, etc.) ( Van den Berg et al, 2018). There is also a diversity of groups and projects from the UFV and the local NGO CTA-ZM working together with farmers on a great variety of topics related to management, such as sustainable animal production, management of homegardens, landrace seed saving, water management, access to markets, and agroforestry systems, among others (Silveira et al, 2017).…”
Section: Chapter 1 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation