ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers on - SIGGRAPH '06 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1179352.1141925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reassembling fractured objects by geometric matching

Abstract: We present a system for automatic reassembly of broken 3D solids. Given as input 3D digital models of the broken fragments, we analyze the geometry of the fracture surfaces to find a globally consistent reconstruction of the original object. Our reconstruction pipeline consists of a graph-cuts based segmentation algorithm for identifying potential fracture surfaces, feature-based robust global registration for pairwise matching of fragments, and simultaneous constrained local registration of multiple fragments… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neugebauer [1997], Benjemaa and Schmitt [1998], Williams and Bennamoun [2000], Li and Guskov [2005], and Krishnan et al [2005] describe closed-form methods for determining the alignment of all scans simultaneously, while Wen et al [2005] simultaneously solve for both rigid pose and target feature positions, assuming corre-spondences are known. Huang et al [2006] incorporate a nonintersection constraint during global registration. Our method is most similar to Pulli's: we scale to large datasets by dividing registration into two phases, a computationally expensive yet parallelizable pairwise alignment for all pairs of overlapping scans followed by a global optimization based only on point pairs computed during the first phase.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neugebauer [1997], Benjemaa and Schmitt [1998], Williams and Bennamoun [2000], Li and Guskov [2005], and Krishnan et al [2005] describe closed-form methods for determining the alignment of all scans simultaneously, while Wen et al [2005] simultaneously solve for both rigid pose and target feature positions, assuming corre-spondences are known. Huang et al [2006] incorporate a nonintersection constraint during global registration. Our method is most similar to Pulli's: we scale to large datasets by dividing registration into two phases, a computationally expensive yet parallelizable pairwise alignment for all pairs of overlapping scans followed by a global optimization based only on point pairs computed during the first phase.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To select the feature points, shape descriptors are used, including the global harmonic shape descriptors,16 light field descriptors, 17 integral volume descriptors,18 curvature-based local descriptors,19 and integral invariant multi-scale surface characteristics 20. A priority-based search would be performed to match the surface features between two geometric models 21.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this line, multiple descriptors that simplify the search process have been proposed based on curvature [12], [13] or integral invariants [14], [15]. To calculate the descriptor's alignment, there are techniques based in combinatory optimization [15], [16], random algorithms RANSAC [13], [17] or forward search [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%