Reasons for surgical revision after conservatively treated radial head fractures—retrospective study of 70 patients

Abstract

BackgroundAn inadequate clinical outcome after conservatively treated radial head fractures is not uncommon. We analyzed the subjective limitations, objective complaints, and surgical procedures for radial head fractures initially treated conservatively.Patients and methodBetween 2007 and 2016, 70 patients (42 men, 28 women) who suffered from fracture sequelae after conservatively treated radial head fractures were examined. Demographic (age, 41.8 years, range, 16–75 years) and clinical data (pain, range of motion, instability) were retrospectively evaluated.ResultsThe average time to surgery after trauma was 50 months (range, 5–360 months). In 38 cases, radial head fractures were initially treated with immobilization for 3.4 weeks (range, 1–8 weeks). Physiotherapeutic treatment was performed in 39 cases. In only half of the cases was retrospective Mason classification possible: 20 type I, 8 type II, 5 type III, and 2 type IV. Of the 70 patients, 53 had posttraumatic elbow stiffness; 34 had isolated lateral and four patients isolated medial ligament instability. There were eight cases with a combination of lateral and medial ligament instability and 27 cases of elbow stiffness combined with instability. An average of 1.2 (range, 1–4) surgical procedures per patient were performed. In all, 64 patients underwent elbow arthroscopy with arthrolysis and additional treatment depending on other injuries. The range of motion improved on average from preoperative flexion/extension of 131–15–0° to postoperative flexion/extension of 135–5–0° (gain in flexion: 4.2° and extension: 10.6°).ConclusionConservative treatment of radial head fractures does not always yield good results. Reasons for a poor outcome include chronic instability, cartilage damage, stiffness, or a combination thereof. Improved outcomes can be achieved via arthroscopic arthrolysis.

Biomechanical comparison of different internal fixation devices for transversely unstable Mason type II radial head fractures

“…Conservative treatment for M2RFs predisposes patients to complications such as elbow pain, decreased grip strength, and lateral elbow instability because of the inability to achieve fracture end reduction ( Nietschke et al, 2018 ; Wen et al, 2022 ). It has long been accepted that M2RF with displacement ≥2 mm requires ORIF ( Ruchelsman et al, 2013 ).…”