Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial and understand how these may contribute to recruitment of non-representative research samples. We also aimed to elicit non-participants’ own recommendations for enhancing trial uptake in primary care.DesignSemistructured telephone interviews with non-participants to a randomised controlled trial of a very brief intervention for promoting physical activity conducted in primary care (the Very Brief Interventions trial), with thematic analysis of interview transcripts.Setting5 general practice (GP) surgeries in the East of England, UK.ParticipantsInterviews were completed with 10 female and 6 male non-participants of white ethnicity and aged between 40 and 71 years. 13 of the 16 interviewees were either active or moderately active according to the GP Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ).ResultsInterviewees discussed a range of reasons for non-participation. These included beliefs surrounding the personal relevance of the trial based on preconceptions of intervention content. Many interviewees considered themselves either sufficiently active or too functionally limited to increase activity levels further, so rendering participation pointless in their view. Other identified barriers included a lack of free time, for trial participation and for increasing physical activity, and dissatisfaction with appointment scheduling systems in place at GP surgeries. Interviewees questioned the appropriateness of primary care as a context for delivering interventions to promote physical activity. In general, interviewees were positively disposed towards the idea of trial participation, especially if personal benefits are made salient, but suggested that interventions could be delivered in a different setting such as the internet.ConclusionsTo increase participation in physical activity promotion trials conducted in primary care, the content of invitation materials and procedures for contacting potential participants require reconsideration. Specific recommendations include streamlining intervention materials and enhancing their relevance to the health concerns of invitees.Trial registration numberISRCTN72691150; Pre-results.

GPs’ knowledge, use, and confidence in national physical activity and health guidelines and tools: a questionnaire-based survey of general practice in England

“…9,18 There are several patient-centred studies that have investigated awareness of PA guidelines, beliefs about activity, and reasons for non-participation in exercise. [19][20][21] However, there is only limited literature available on knowledge of PA measurement tools and guidelines by healthcare professionals. These papers are low powered, with small sample sizes (n = 14 231 and n = 177, respectively) and are only regionally based.…”

Mobile App for Improved Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

“…These align with our quantitative findings that variation in app usage across sites was at least in part driven by variation in implementation. Future implementations of digital health apps would benefit from a clear effort to include factors that improve engagement, including a strong clinical endorsement, ongoing physician involvement, and patient reminders [35].…”

Promoting physical activity among community groups of older women in socio-economically disadvantaged areas: randomised feasibility study

“…Although PA promotion programmes are available, many individuals fail to engage in them due to lack of time, access issues, competing commitments, inconvenient programme scheduling, financial costs and lack of affiliation with others in the programme [17–21]. Programmes that are context-specific and delivered within the community may help overcome some of these barriers [22], such as accessibility, convenience and cost.…”