2020
DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1788668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons for living among those with lived experience entering the suicide prevention workforce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional tools described by participants in this study, and ones not in the RFL inventory, included broader positive social and policy changes (e.g., same-sex marriage rights and anti-stigma campaigns, bridge barriers as demonstrating community care), the ability to reinvent oneself, exercise, nature, storytelling, peer-support, and pets. Manythough not all-of the tools or reasons for living to emerge from the present analysis were also found in a recent study by Hawgood et al [33] (pets, broad social policy and societal change did not appear in that investigation). In addition, while Hawgood's study found that being oriented toward the future helped people live [33]-and this was the case for many participants in the present study as well, especially for young people-other participants found that being focused on the present was most useful.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional tools described by participants in this study, and ones not in the RFL inventory, included broader positive social and policy changes (e.g., same-sex marriage rights and anti-stigma campaigns, bridge barriers as demonstrating community care), the ability to reinvent oneself, exercise, nature, storytelling, peer-support, and pets. Manythough not all-of the tools or reasons for living to emerge from the present analysis were also found in a recent study by Hawgood et al [33] (pets, broad social policy and societal change did not appear in that investigation). In addition, while Hawgood's study found that being oriented toward the future helped people live [33]-and this was the case for many participants in the present study as well, especially for young people-other participants found that being focused on the present was most useful.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Manythough not all-of the tools or reasons for living to emerge from the present analysis were also found in a recent study by Hawgood et al [33] (pets, broad social policy and societal change did not appear in that investigation). In addition, while Hawgood's study found that being oriented toward the future helped people live [33]-and this was the case for many participants in the present study as well, especially for young people-other participants found that being focused on the present was most useful. Vatne et al (2016) also examined what resources strengthened patients' desire to live after a suicide attempt [34] and found that a sense of connectedness and having someone who cares was crucial, findings that resonate with this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Findings consistently reveal an increase in knowledge about suicide and suicidal behavior as an outcome of GKT (Yonemoto et al, 2019), which may facilitate increased confidence and willingness to engage in intervention behavior (Rallis et al, 2018). Additionally, understanding lived experience of suicide and the critical place it has in suicide prevention reflects critical and emerging GK knowledge relevant for engaging, connecting, and responding to suicidal crisis (Hawgood et al, 2020). Skills and abilities involve different competency facets, including being able to recognize suicidality, being able to engage the suicidal person in an empathic and compassionate manner, and enabling crisis intervention and referral (Gould et al, 2013; QPR, n.d.).…”
Section: Proposed Gatekeeper Competenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, given that suicide is a behaviour and not a mental illness [ 11 ], the direct provision of support to those in suicidal distress may be very different to the support required for mental health experiences. Existing guidelines for the training and support of mental health LEW [ 12 ] lack tailored components deemed essential to the training and support of the suicide prevention LEW, such as their ability to discuss suicide safely without increasing suicide risk or stigma, as well as their own safety in terms of suicide risk [ 13 ]. Furthermore, the skills required by the suicide prevention LEW for supporting those in suicidal distress through to those bereaved by suicide demand a nuanced understanding of impacts of suicide-related stigma and the shame, guilt, and other internalised negative experiences associated with suicide lived experience [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a small body of emerging research that has explored what motivates a person to become involved in the suicide prevention LEW [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], the potential benefits of participation [ 3 , 21 ], and the challenges involved in having a suicide prevention LEW [ 22 , 23 ]. However, we were unable to identify any guidelines for supporting their initial and sustained engagement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%