2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03225-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons for Living

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RFL have been conceptualized as resilience factors that buffer against suicidal thoughts and behaviours. They can include beliefs, attitudes, interpersonal relationships, values and religious/spiritual considerations, among other elements (Calati et al, 2018). The Reasons for Living Inventory (RFLI) was developed to examine distinct reasons individuals have for not dying by suicide (Linehan et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…RFL have been conceptualized as resilience factors that buffer against suicidal thoughts and behaviours. They can include beliefs, attitudes, interpersonal relationships, values and religious/spiritual considerations, among other elements (Calati et al, 2018). The Reasons for Living Inventory (RFLI) was developed to examine distinct reasons individuals have for not dying by suicide (Linehan et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on factor analyses, this 48‐item inventory can be further broken down into six subscales—Survival and Coping Beliefs, Responsibility to Family, Child‐Related Concerns, Fear of Suicide, Fear of Social Disapproval and Moral Objections. This inventory has been studied extensively in relation to suicide among clinical and non‐clinical samples (Bakhiyi et al, 2016; Calati et al, 2018). Indeed, multiple additional scales have been subsequently developed to capture reasons for living in specific subpopulations, including adolescents, young adults, college students, older adults and scales adapted in different languages (Calati et al, 2018; Edelstein et al, 2009; Osman et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation