2006
DOI: 10.1080/13501760600999565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons for constitutionalization: non-discrimination, minority rights and social rights in the Convention on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regular executive and legislative elections continue to keep politicians and politics in check, the (unelected) representatives in the judiciary continue to balance legislators and presidents keen to roll back democracy, but sufficient numbers of the electorate are yet to show enthusiasm for a challenge to the experts making decisions for the people (Barnes and Simon 1998;Orenstein 2009). The EU's Eastern enlargement has been widely perceived not only to promise a departure from non-democratic political regimes for good; in co-opting the view that "Europeanisation equals democratisation", it increased the stakes for both the elites and the people in the accession states to cooperate in the short term to benefit from governance closer to "the people" in the long run (Agarin and Yilmaz 2016;Noutcheva 2016;Keil 2013;Schwellnus 2006). As such, the EU accession only facilitated the consolidation of "the people" around the putatively homogeneous "nation".…”
Section: Postcommunist State-society Compactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular executive and legislative elections continue to keep politicians and politics in check, the (unelected) representatives in the judiciary continue to balance legislators and presidents keen to roll back democracy, but sufficient numbers of the electorate are yet to show enthusiasm for a challenge to the experts making decisions for the people (Barnes and Simon 1998;Orenstein 2009). The EU's Eastern enlargement has been widely perceived not only to promise a departure from non-democratic political regimes for good; in co-opting the view that "Europeanisation equals democratisation", it increased the stakes for both the elites and the people in the accession states to cooperate in the short term to benefit from governance closer to "the people" in the long run (Agarin and Yilmaz 2016;Noutcheva 2016;Keil 2013;Schwellnus 2006). As such, the EU accession only facilitated the consolidation of "the people" around the putatively homogeneous "nation".…”
Section: Postcommunist State-society Compactmentioning
confidence: 99%