Reasons for and barriers to biosafety and biosecurity training in health-related organizations in Africa, Middle East and Central Asia: findings from GIBACHT training needs assessments 2018-2019

Abstract

Introduction the Global-Partnership-Initiated-Biosecurity-Academia for Controlling Health Threats (GIBACHT) consortium conducts a biosafety and biosecurity training for fellows from Africa, the Middle East and Asia. To achieve a multiplier effect, fellows conduct trainings in their own organizations. It was during such trainings that training needs assessments were done assessing reasons for and barriers to biosafety and biosecurity training. Methods this was a cross sectional assessment. Trainings were conducted from April to July 2018 and April to June 2019. In 2018, training needs were explored using a structured tool. Responses were coded using manifest content analysis and key issues identified. In 2019, respondents quantified the identified key issues using a Likert scale. Proportions of those who strongly agreed, agreed, neither agreed nor disagreed, disagreed or strongly disagreed were calculated and results presented in tables and charts. Results in 2018 and 2019, there were 183 and 191 respondents respectively. About 96% of respondents in 2018 supported training in biosafety and biosecurity citing individual, community and global benefits. Barriers highlighted included governance, financial, human resource, information and infrastructure challenges. In 2019, majority of respondents indicated inadequate guidelines dissemination, lack of financial resources, inadequate personnel, lack of equipped laboratories and lack of instructional materials among major barriers. Conclusion support for biosafety and biosecurity training was high though systemic barriers exist. Improving human resource capacity and provision of instructional materials can be achieved through training programs. However, systemic assessments need to be done before each training as different organizations have different barriers.

A Situation Analysis of the Capacity of Laboratories in Zambia to Conduct Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges

“…The challenges in biosafety and biosecurity have been documented in other countries, outlining the lack of safety assurance leading to unsafe handling of infectious materials in the laboratory [83,84]. Ultimately, this affected the implementation of AMR programs in health facilities and laboratories [85,86]. Our findings and those reported in other studies indicate the need to conduct frequent assessments and monitoring of biosafety and biosecurity in laboratories [87].…”

Why the world has no universal biosafety standards

“…At the first global meeting on the world’s highest containment laboratories (biosafety level 4) in December 2017, experts from over 20 countries identified numerous gaps, including in the identification of best practices, rosters of expert trainers, and institutional assessment programmes 7. Surveys on the barriers to biosecurity training in health related organisations in Africa, the Middle East, and central Asia in 2018 and 2019 identified factors including governance, finances, and human resources 8…”

One Health epidemic preparedness: Biosafety quality improvement training in Nigeria

“…Furthermore, this biosafety training included participant feedback on the relevance of the training in improving their current practices with respect to infection prevention and control and sample labeling and transport among others. A similar study carried out in Uganda on needs assessment for biosafety training among healthcare workers was supported by over 90% of the participants [9]. That study highlighted the perceived benefits of biosafety training to include individual capacity development, community, national, and global health issues.…”