Free Will and Theism 2016
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198743958.003.0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons and Divine Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors have developed theories of divine action. Rice (2016), for instance, argues that agent-causal theories of action-including those applied to God-face difficulties accounting for what action-for-a-reason consists in. Rice's causal theory of divine action that avoids the aforementioned objection-an account according to which "[f]or every event e in the life of God, e is an action of God's iff e is caused by the appropriate (rationalizing) [divine] mental items" (2016, p. 272)-is uniquely unavailable to classical theism.…”
Section: Explainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have developed theories of divine action. Rice (2016), for instance, argues that agent-causal theories of action-including those applied to God-face difficulties accounting for what action-for-a-reason consists in. Rice's causal theory of divine action that avoids the aforementioned objection-an account according to which "[f]or every event e in the life of God, e is an action of God's iff e is caused by the appropriate (rationalizing) [divine] mental items" (2016, p. 272)-is uniquely unavailable to classical theism.…”
Section: Explainsmentioning
confidence: 99%