2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasoning within intuitionistic fuzzy rough description logics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, properties and semantics of ontology constructs mainly are determined by Description Logics (DLs) [38][39][40], a family of logics for representing structured knowledge which have proved to be very useful as ontology languages [44]. Formally, an ontology is a triple O = ⟨RB, T B, AB⟩, where RB (the Role Box or RBox) and T B (the Terminological Box or TBox) comprise the intensional knowledge, i.e., general knowledge about the world to be described (statements about roles and concepts, respectively), and AB (the Assertional Box or ABox) the extensional knowledge, i.e., particular knowledge about a specific instantiation of this world (statements about individuals in terms of concepts and roles) [44].…”
Section: Ontologies and Description Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nowadays, properties and semantics of ontology constructs mainly are determined by Description Logics (DLs) [38][39][40], a family of logics for representing structured knowledge which have proved to be very useful as ontology languages [44]. Formally, an ontology is a triple O = ⟨RB, T B, AB⟩, where RB (the Role Box or RBox) and T B (the Terminological Box or TBox) comprise the intensional knowledge, i.e., general knowledge about the world to be described (statements about roles and concepts, respectively), and AB (the Assertional Box or ABox) the extensional knowledge, i.e., particular knowledge about a specific instantiation of this world (statements about individuals in terms of concepts and roles) [44].…”
Section: Ontologies and Description Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, each parameter is only a word or a sentence, and expressive (or complex) parameters are not considered in soft sets [37]. In order to extend the expressive power of soft sets, Jiang et al [37] used the concepts of Description Logics (DLs) [38][39][40] to act as the parameters of soft sets. That is, an extended soft set theory based on DLs was presented in [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of the membership degree and the non-membership degree of each ordered pair is less than or equal to one. Since it was first introduced in 1986, IFS theory has been widely investigated and applied to a variety of fields [2,4,12,13,20,22]. Information aggregation is an interesting and important research topic in IFS theory that has been receiving more and more attention in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the notion of a conventional fuzzy set, Atanassov [2] introduced the concept of an intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS), which is a generalization of the fuzzy set, to provide additional information about indeterminacy degrees. Since IFSs can adequately measure the decision-making process of human beings and cope with incomplete information, the merits of IFSs have been applied in various fields, including logical reasoning [19], pattern recognition [16], and decision-making [36]. In particular, Li [22] and Lin et al [24] used a linear programming model to assess the optimal attribute weights in MADM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%