2nd European Workshop on the Integration of Knowledge, Semantics and Digital Media Technology (EWIMT 2005) 2005
DOI: 10.1049/ic.2005.0749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasoning on the semantic web: beyond ontology languages and reasoners

Abstract: This article discusses forms of reasoning (beyond ontology reasoning), and reasoning languages (beyond ontology languages), that are needed for a full deployment of the Semantic Web. We first outline a motivating application scenario, then discuss the logic languages needed on the Semantic Web and related issues. The views reported about in this article underly and have been developed within the EU research project REWERSE (REasoning on the WEb with Rules and SEmantics, cf. http://rewerse.net).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time model in AROM-ST [17] offers several time types including instant, interval, multiInstant, and multiInterval types. The importance of time considerations in ontologies was initiated by the semantic web community [18]. A variety of approaches have been proposed to represent temporal information in RDF [19] and OWL [20].…”
Section: Prosopographical Concepts: a State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time model in AROM-ST [17] offers several time types including instant, interval, multiInstant, and multiInterval types. The importance of time considerations in ontologies was initiated by the semantic web community [18]. A variety of approaches have been proposed to represent temporal information in RDF [19] and OWL [20].…”
Section: Prosopographical Concepts: a State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fran et al provided a discussion on reasoning framework for the semantic languages [5]. They believe that deductive languages and reactive rules are prerequisite for a semantic reasoning.…”
Section: Ontology Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine reasoning has the ability to uncover implicit relationships in the data, rather than simply retrieving explicitly represented data, as is the case of querying a database. However, machine reasoning over large and complex data sets requires the use of appropriate and meaningful knowledge representations of the domain area combined with presentation of the data in machinereadable format [6]. One technique for implementing knowledge representation that has been readily adopted in biology has been the construction of bio-ontologies to establish a precisely (if not formally) defined way to model and express the knowledge of a domain in terms of defined concepts: the classes of "things", the relationships that exist between these classes, and the rules or axioms that apply to these concepts in the domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%