2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2006.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasoning About Imperative Quantum Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aim to investigate Hoare-style reasoning and dynamic logics for quantum programming. Towards this end, we have already designed logics for reasoning about individual quantum states [19,5] and a sound Hoare logic for basic quantum imperative programs [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aim to investigate Hoare-style reasoning and dynamic logics for quantum programming. Towards this end, we have already designed logics for reasoning about individual quantum states [19,5] and a sound Hoare logic for basic quantum imperative programs [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another quantum Hoare logic is given by Chadha et al in [12]. Also their logic is based on a probabilistic Hoare logic.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• is 1/2 under Γ = q : qbit and A = H E 0 H. Unlike the logic in [12], we cannot describe a state of a quantum bit directly. We describe only a property on probability through measurement.…”
Section: γ a V |= φ Is Defined Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brunet and Jorrand [35] introduced a way of applying Birkhoff and von Neumann's quantum logic in reasoning about quantum programs. Chadha et al [36] proposed a Hoare-style proof system for reasoning about imperative quantum programs in which only bounded iterations are allowed. Some useful proof rules were proposed in [37] for purely quantum programs.…”
Section: Proof Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%