The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rearrangement planning using object-centric and robot-centric action spaces

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of rearrangement planning, i.e. to find a feasible trajectory for a robot that must interact with multiple objects in order to achieve a goal. We propose a planner to solve the rearrangement planning problem by considering two different types of actions: robot-centric and object-centric. Object-centric actions guide the planner to perform specific actions on specific objects. Robot-centric actions move the robot without object relevant intent, easily allowing simultaneous objec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with FFRob's batch action sampling, HBF samples action primitives while simultaneously searching through the statespace. King et al (2016) investigated rearrangement planning with both object-centric motions, actions involving a particular object, and robot-centric motions, actions not involving any particular objects. Most of the presented literature involves only object-centric motions.…”
Section: Manipulation Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with FFRob's batch action sampling, HBF samples action primitives while simultaneously searching through the statespace. King et al (2016) investigated rearrangement planning with both object-centric motions, actions involving a particular object, and robot-centric motions, actions not involving any particular objects. Most of the presented literature involves only object-centric motions.…”
Section: Manipulation Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object Rearrangement with Nonprehensile Actions: A framework that plans rearrangement of clutter using nonprehensile actions, such as pushing, was introduced by Dogar et al [21], but it did not consider nested actions. A version of RRT with Kinodynamics also used nonprehensile whole arm rearrangement planning [13], [22]. This approach is related to ours in the sense that whole arm manipulation can be seen as a special type of nested manipulation actions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Path π main can be followed simultaneously by a train of other objects lined up behind the frontal object if they have a similar or smaller footprint. To this end, the algorithm proceeds into placing the remaining objects in the reverse order of list L (lines [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Note that L can also contain a single object as a special case.…”
Section: B Nested Pushingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The propagation step is performed using a physics engine such as ODE. Within this framework, approaches are proposed for problems like motion planning among collisionable obstacles [19], rearrangement planning [20] [21], object placement [22], object sorting [23] or bin picking [24]. This paper will tackle the clutter grasping problem using a physics-based motion planner able to cope with uncertainty in the initial state of the system and in the poses of the objects as a result of robot-object or object-object interactions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%