Abstract:Fear is seen to be one of the defining political emotions of late modernity. Filmmakers, sociologists, artists, philosophers, and pundits see fear everywhere. If fear is a way of life, the contemporary city is seen by many to be one of its most prominent and productive social laboratories. But while fear is seen to be so politically significant, the way it is studied often both naturalizes and exteriorizes fear from politics. As a result, fear’s antagonistic status as both a social relation and an arena of pol… Show more
“…Neighbors collaborate to cut lawns and cultivate gardens; throngs of bicycles reclaim streets in the Detroit Slow Roll. Reclaiming the open spaces of the city (Allon, 2013) and occupying the spaces of fear (Jeffries, 2013), whether with bikes or flowers or sculptures, are two potential strategies for defanging the monstrous city. Artists are extremely sensitive to the power of images, and it should be no surprise that artists have seized upon Detroit’s distinctive visual and symbolic qualities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of the city as a haven for evil spirits is of course nothing new, but Jeffries (2013) argues that in contemporary societies cities have reemerged as a “repository of fear.” As a city and as a symbol, Detroit has been made to stand in for a particularly American set of fears about urban society and where it is heading. Whether Chafets intended to identify Black Detroit as one overtaken by “devils,” thus summoning a historically racialized iconography which links both Black people and the places where they live (Africa, Haiti) to malevolent supernatural forces, his language makes this connection difficult to avoid.…”
Section: Background: Detroit and The American Social Imaginarymentioning
As researchers working in Detroit, we have become sensitized to the rhetoric often deployed to describe the city, especially the vocabulary of monstrosity. While providing powerful images of Detroit’s problems, insidious monster narratives also obscure genuine understanding of the city. In this article, we first discuss the city of Detroit itself, describing its place in the American and global social imaginary as a product of its particular history. Second, we consider the concept of monstrosity, particularly as it applies to urban environments. Following this, we relate several prevalent or popular categories of monster to descriptions of Detroit, considering what each one reveals and implies about the state of the city, its landscape and its people. Finally, we discuss how narratives of monstrosity may be engaged and utilized to serve alternative ends.
“…Neighbors collaborate to cut lawns and cultivate gardens; throngs of bicycles reclaim streets in the Detroit Slow Roll. Reclaiming the open spaces of the city (Allon, 2013) and occupying the spaces of fear (Jeffries, 2013), whether with bikes or flowers or sculptures, are two potential strategies for defanging the monstrous city. Artists are extremely sensitive to the power of images, and it should be no surprise that artists have seized upon Detroit’s distinctive visual and symbolic qualities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of the city as a haven for evil spirits is of course nothing new, but Jeffries (2013) argues that in contemporary societies cities have reemerged as a “repository of fear.” As a city and as a symbol, Detroit has been made to stand in for a particularly American set of fears about urban society and where it is heading. Whether Chafets intended to identify Black Detroit as one overtaken by “devils,” thus summoning a historically racialized iconography which links both Black people and the places where they live (Africa, Haiti) to malevolent supernatural forces, his language makes this connection difficult to avoid.…”
Section: Background: Detroit and The American Social Imaginarymentioning
As researchers working in Detroit, we have become sensitized to the rhetoric often deployed to describe the city, especially the vocabulary of monstrosity. While providing powerful images of Detroit’s problems, insidious monster narratives also obscure genuine understanding of the city. In this article, we first discuss the city of Detroit itself, describing its place in the American and global social imaginary as a product of its particular history. Second, we consider the concept of monstrosity, particularly as it applies to urban environments. Following this, we relate several prevalent or popular categories of monster to descriptions of Detroit, considering what each one reveals and implies about the state of the city, its landscape and its people. Finally, we discuss how narratives of monstrosity may be engaged and utilized to serve alternative ends.
“…To disagree with demarcations, divisions, partitions, borders (i.e., dissensus) is to Ranciere (2010) the “essence of politics” (p. 38). Walking Borders sought, as Jeffers (2014) has described of other social movements (e.g., Arab Spring, and Occupy Wall Street), to reappropriate cultures and climates of fear, central to global capitalist politics, through collective action.…”
Section: Walking Borders: Arts Activism For Refugee and Asylum-seekermentioning
Australia’s Operation Sovereign Borders vehemently enforces closed borders to asylum seekers arriving by boat to Australia. Policed urban borders were enforced in Brisbane, Australia, during the G20 Summit in 2014, to protect visiting dignitaries from potential violent protest. The ephemeral arts intervention Walking Borders: Arts activism for refugee and asylum seeker rights symbolically confronted border politics by peacefully protesting against Australian immigration policy. Rather than focusing on the direct effects of the ephemeral arts intervention, this article attends to the affective workings of the aesthetic elements of the project through sensory ethnography and storying. Informed by Ranciere’s aesthetics of politics, this article explores the affective experience and potential educative gains of the ethical turn attended to in participatory arts such as ephemeral arts interventions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.