2009
DOI: 10.1080/00905990902985637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reappraising Communism and Nationalism

Abstract: There are two popular myths concerning the relationship between communism and nationalism. The first is that nationalism and communism are wholly antagonistic and mutually exclusive. The second is the assertion that in communist Eastern Europe nationalism was oppressed before 1989, to emerge triumphant after the Berlin Wall came down. Reality was different. Certainly from 1945 onwards, communist parties presented themselves as heirs to national traditions and guardians of national interests. The communist stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nationalism and the left usually are treated as polar opposites and theoretically incompatible (Minkenberg 1995; Mevius 2011). The main features of the radical left include a rejection of capitalism, a call for a major redistribution of resources, ‘the espousal of collective economic and social rights’ (March & Mudde 2005: 25) and internationalism.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations On Euroscepticism and Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nationalism and the left usually are treated as polar opposites and theoretically incompatible (Minkenberg 1995; Mevius 2011). The main features of the radical left include a rejection of capitalism, a call for a major redistribution of resources, ‘the espousal of collective economic and social rights’ (March & Mudde 2005: 25) and internationalism.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations On Euroscepticism and Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between nationalism and left‐wing radicalism may be traced historically as the ‘product of the Enlightenment and the French revolution’ (Erk 2010: 425), where there is a close link between nationalism and civic concepts such as ‘popular sovereignty’ (Yack 2001) and ‘class’ (Schwarzmantel 1987). The combination of the national, class (Hobsbawm 1990; Mevius 2011) and popular dimensions of the French Revolution culminated in directing ‘its struggle against the social elite of its own ethnie’ (Smith 2004: 203) – in other words, in the equation of nation and people, seen from below as representing the common interest of the nation against the privileged elites (Hobsbawm 1990: 20). This explains why nationalism has been associated with early radical and labour movements of the 1830s, 1840s and 1850s (Breuilly 2011) as well as with a number of more recent radical left‐wing and/or communist movements, whose trajectory can be explained by this equation of nation with class, including Stalin's Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Mao's China, Nasser's Egypt, Ho Chi Minh's Vietnam, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia (Tonnesson 2009) and Milosevic's Serbian Communist Party (Mevius 2011: 2).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations On Euroscepticism and Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If communism is regarded as narrow dogmatism, it may seem obvious that the two ideas are completely mutually exclusive (Kemp, 1999), or, at best, the political discourse on the nation and national values can be considered merely as a rhetorical strategy of communist power seeking (Connor, 1984). Moving away from these explanations, I suggest that socialist patriotism can be regarded as a communist response to the question of nationalism, which produced greatly different ideological variants in the Soviet Union and later in Eastern Europe (Mevius, 2009). The kinship between the socialist patriotisms of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe can be recognised in their basic conceptual structure.…”
Section: Empire Nations and Already Existing Socialismsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Connor’s thesis became influential after the revolutions of 1989. Historians began to note the fusion of national legitimacy and communist ideologies under communist/post-communist regimes, usually by elaborating upon how a single state or a revolution in a particular state had mobilized nationalist symbols to support a communist agenda (see Mevius, 2009). A most relevant source in this regard is Liliana Riga’s (2012) masterpiece, which probes how the internal struggle among religious universality, ethnic particularity and geopolitical nationalism shaped the Bolsheviks’ comprehensions of communist ideology.…”
Section: Nationality Models: China’s Deviation From the Soviet Unionmentioning
confidence: 99%