2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reappraisal of factors impacting the cannulation rate and clinical efficacy of endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conti et al reported that the technical success rate of the minor papilla cannulation was 82.1%. 5 The reasons for the difficulty of the minor papilla cannulation are the inability to identify the minor papilla and the absence of a visible orifice. 1 Several studies have described the methods for the detection of minor papillary orifices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conti et al reported that the technical success rate of the minor papilla cannulation was 82.1%. 5 The reasons for the difficulty of the minor papilla cannulation are the inability to identify the minor papilla and the absence of a visible orifice. 1 Several studies have described the methods for the detection of minor papillary orifices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of TXI has been frequently reported in detecting and visualizing gastrointestinal diseases. 8 In the context of pancreatobiliary lesions, TXI has proven to be a valuable tool in identifying anastomotic strictures and bile duct orifices, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] as well as in enhancing the diagnostic quality of peroral cholangioscopy. 10 However, there is currently no published evidence of its usefulness in identifying the orifice of the minor papilla.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation