2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2021.104276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reappraisal of archaeal C20-C25 diether lipid (extended archaeol) origin and use as a biomarker of hypersalinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the low amount of hydroxyarchaeol in the investigated samples did not allow for the measurement of its normalδ13C values that could have informed us on the occurrence of AOM. On the other hand, the range of normalδ13C values measured for Dead Sea archaeol (between −30 and −25‰) indicates an origin of this compound different from ANME, and its abundance along with that of extended archaeol (Figure 3d) rather supports halophilic archaea of the Haloarchaea class as a major biological source of archaeol (Vandier et al, 2021). These organisms classically dominate in the Dead Sea modern and ancient waters (Bodaker et al, 2010; Thomas & Ariztegui, 2019), and sediments (Grice et al, 1998; Thomas et al, 2015, Thomas, Grossi, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the low amount of hydroxyarchaeol in the investigated samples did not allow for the measurement of its normalδ13C values that could have informed us on the occurrence of AOM. On the other hand, the range of normalδ13C values measured for Dead Sea archaeol (between −30 and −25‰) indicates an origin of this compound different from ANME, and its abundance along with that of extended archaeol (Figure 3d) rather supports halophilic archaea of the Haloarchaea class as a major biological source of archaeol (Vandier et al, 2021). These organisms classically dominate in the Dead Sea modern and ancient waters (Bodaker et al, 2010; Thomas & Ariztegui, 2019), and sediments (Grice et al, 1998; Thomas et al, 2015, Thomas, Grossi, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…indicates an origin of this compound different from ANME, and its abundance along with that of extended archaeol (Figure 3d) rather supports halophilic archaea of the Haloarchaea class as a major biological source of archaeol (Vandier et al, 2021). These organisms classically dominate in the Dead Sea modern and ancient waters (Bodaker et al, 2010;Thomas & Ariztegui, 2019), and sediments (Grice et al, 1998;Thomas et al, 2015, Thomas, Grossi, et al, 2019.…”
Section: Sulfatementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Along with other lipid biomarkers, some DGDs such as extended archaeol (often abbreviated C 20 –C 25 due to both of its alkyl chains) are recurrent biomarkers of archaeal inhabitants in hypersaline environments. Extended archaeol has also been identified in a few species of non-halophilic methanogens (Becker et al , 2016 ), yet, in hypersaline environments it is considered a hallmark of halophilic Euryarchaeota ( Table 2 ), from the clade Haloarchaea (Dawson et al , 2012 ), and mostly from the orders Halobacteriales, Haloferacales, and Natrialbales (Vandier et al , 2021 ). As archaeol is globally distributed among Archaea (Koga et al ., 1993 ; Koga, 2012 ; Tourte et al , 2020 ), the relative abundance of extended archaeol over archaeol may be used as a proxy of Haloarchaea (Vandier et al , 2021 ).…”
Section: Hypersaline Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also monitored for extended archaeol, biomarker specific to halophilic Euryarchaeota, in a subset of samples (Bale et al, 2019;Vandier et al, 2021) and calculate the ratio R EA following Vandier et al (2021):…”
Section: Gdgt Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured extended archaeol for six samples (three pre-5.5 ka, three post-5.5 ka) and detect this compound in all six. We calculate R EA , defined by Vandier et al (2021) as the ratio of extended archaeol to the sum of extended archaeol and archaeol, and find R EA to range from 3% to 30%, with the pre-5.5 ka average being 20% (1σ = 12%) and the post-5.5 ka being 6% (1σ = 3%) (Figures 4a and 5b). The presence of this compound confirms the presence of abundant halophilic Euryarchaeota.…”
Section: Gsl Holocene Paleosalinitymentioning
confidence: 99%