1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb00994.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reapportionment and Public Policy: State Legislators' Perspectives*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our desire to focus on redistricting reflects both its political importance and its central role in a theory of democratic representation. The political impact is easily documented; individual legislators, for example, are well aware of effect of reapportionment on their own careers and on the balance of legislative power and public policy (Saffell 1982). The theoretic prominence of reapportionment stems from the fact that at the heart of the reapportionment process are conceptions of representation and democratic responsiveness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our desire to focus on redistricting reflects both its political importance and its central role in a theory of democratic representation. The political impact is easily documented; individual legislators, for example, are well aware of effect of reapportionment on their own careers and on the balance of legislative power and public policy (Saffell 1982). The theoretic prominence of reapportionment stems from the fact that at the heart of the reapportionment process are conceptions of representation and democratic responsiveness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%