2018
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reanalysis of the Gaia Data Release 2 photometric sensitivity curves using HST/STIS spectrophotometry

Abstract: Context. The second data release (DR2) from the European Space Agency mission Gaia took place on April 2018. DR2 included photometry for more than 1.3 · 10 9 sources in the three bands G, G BP , and G RP . Even though the Gaia DR2 photometry is very precise, there are currently three alternative definitions of the sensitivity curves that show significative differences. Aims. The aim of this paper is to improve the quality of the input calibration data to produce new compatible definitions of the G, G BP , and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
117
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
117
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the parallaxes, we also make use of the threeband Gaia DR2 photometry (G, G BP , G RP ). While these are of an unprecedented precision, several recent works (Weiler 2018;Maíz Apellániz & Weiler 2018;Casagrande & VandenBerg 2018) have shown by comparison with absolute spectrophotometry that the G band suffers from a magnitude-dependent offset, and that the nominal passbands need to be slightly corrected. Therefore, in order to compare the Gaia DR2 G magnitudes to the synthetic Gaia DR2 photometry from stellar models, we have applied the G magnitude corrections, as well as the new passband definitions, given by Maíz Apellániz & Weiler (2018).…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the parallaxes, we also make use of the threeband Gaia DR2 photometry (G, G BP , G RP ). While these are of an unprecedented precision, several recent works (Weiler 2018;Maíz Apellániz & Weiler 2018;Casagrande & VandenBerg 2018) have shown by comparison with absolute spectrophotometry that the G band suffers from a magnitude-dependent offset, and that the nominal passbands need to be slightly corrected. Therefore, in order to compare the Gaia DR2 G magnitudes to the synthetic Gaia DR2 photometry from stellar models, we have applied the G magnitude corrections, as well as the new passband definitions, given by Maíz Apellániz & Weiler (2018).…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…C.2 in Lindegren et al (2018), which we report here for clarity: Evans et al (2018) and Arenou et al (2018) mention that Gaia DR2 photometry is affected by some systematic errors. Evans et al (2018) andMaíz Apellániz &Weiler (2018) propose corrections to mitigate these effects. We apply these corrections and we report them here for clarity:…”
Section: Obtaining a 'Clean' Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data is not only precise but also accurate, as several studies have confirmed with respect to the astrometry and photometry (e.g. Arenou et al 2018;Evans et al 2018;Lindegren et al 2018a;Luri et al 2018;Maíz Apellániz & Weiler 2018, note that this list is incomplete as Gaia DR2 calibration is an ongoing effort). Nevertheless, to achieve the highest accuracy one needs to read the "fine print" of the papers above, as there are biases and quality issues lurking in the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…where k = 1.08 in all cases and σ s is 0.021 mas for G < 13 and 0.043 mas for G ≥ 13 in the case of parallaxes and 0.032 mas/a for G < 13 and 0.066 mas/a for G ≥ 13 in the case of proper motions. -To properly compare the observed magnitudes and colors one has to use the updated sensitivity curves of Maíz Apellániz & Weiler (2018), noting that G BP has different sensitivities for G (as obtained from the Gaia archive) larger or smaller than 10.87 mag. -The G magnitudes obtained from the archive require a correction and the resulting G should be used.…”
Section: Distances To and Membership Of Stellar Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%