2022
DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2022.2032504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realizing public values in the co-production of public services: the effect of efficacy and trust on coping with public values conflicts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2014). Thus, this study adds to the existing literature on coping behavior and co-production (Aschhoff and Vogel, 2018; Jaspers and Steen, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022). First, it highlights the significance of interpretation and coping strategies to enable true implementation of co-production as a way of working in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2014). Thus, this study adds to the existing literature on coping behavior and co-production (Aschhoff and Vogel, 2018; Jaspers and Steen, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022). First, it highlights the significance of interpretation and coping strategies to enable true implementation of co-production as a way of working in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The argument is that the success of co-production relies heavily on the translation efforts of street-level professionals, who bridge the gap between organizational goals and everyday practices (McMullin, 2023), and between potential and actual performances (Brix, 2021). But street-level professionals' willingness to engage in co-production and their ability to handle conflicts arising from co-production implementation remain understudied (Agger and Tortzen, 2022; Jasper and Steen, 2019, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature highlights the importance of codevelopment initiatives between citizens and governments (van Helden and Reichard, 2019;Cohen and Karatzimas, 2022). It is expected that such initiatives would attract citizens' interest in common matters and increase participation (Thomsen and Jakobsen, 2015;Jaspers and Steen, 2022) which is clearly interrelated with citizens' sense of belonging. The sense of belonging motivates them to interact with society, while the interaction and the participation might further ignite their sense of belonging (Hagerty et al, 1996;Perkins and Long, 2002).…”
Section: The Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, citizen participation in urban regeneration is a co-production process that improves citizens' sense of belonging (Wu and Xiong, 2022), while the satisfaction from the participation goes beyond any type of extrinsic reward (Postigo, 2009;Sajeva, 2014). In this realm, governments are supposed to be seeking ways to enhance citizens' involvement in coproduction initiatives (Thomsen and Jakobsen, 2015), aiming at better realizing public values such as improved service quality (Jaspers and Steen, 2022). This can be done by e-participatory platforms that improve the participation of citizens (Secinaro et al, 2022).…”
Section: Sense Of Belonging Participation and Co-creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we follow Moore (2013, p. 469) in understanding public value in the narrowest sense as "public policy commitments to use governmental assets to achieve particular purposes" [38]. It may also be understood as providers of public services seeking to find ways of articulating and meeting the needs of their citizens, for example care needs [39,40]. Ultimately, public service delivery is about outcomes in terms of the value that is created for service users and society.…”
Section: Public Valuementioning
confidence: 99%