2009 IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/edoc.2009.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realizing Correspondences in Multi-viewpoint Specifications

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, we use model transformations in order to identify model correspondences between different models and their metamodels respectively. Relevant approaches for finding correspondences in a multi-model environment are [RJV09] as well as [SK07]. While the former define intensional aspects on the metamodel level and extensional aspects on model level for building software architectures the latter also works on software architectures but define rules for connecting different models based on the same metamodel.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, we use model transformations in order to identify model correspondences between different models and their metamodels respectively. Relevant approaches for finding correspondences in a multi-model environment are [RJV09] as well as [SK07]. While the former define intensional aspects on the metamodel level and extensional aspects on model level for building software architectures the latter also works on software architectures but define rules for connecting different models based on the same metamodel.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very often however, manual steps have to be added in order to make sure that the transformation is correct and complete (e.g. see the definition of extensional connections in [RJV09] or see the definition of intermodel-correspondences in [SK07]). Model transformations are valuable and easy to perform if both models (source and sink) cope with the same issue (e.g.…”
Section: Interconnecting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have proposed different approaches to express correspondences, specially when views are expressed as UML models, using different alternatives: from OCL constraints to UML abstraction dependencies (see [18] for a discussion about some of these approaches). Other proposals use model weaving techniques for relating the elements of different views, defining ad-hoc correspondence metamodels [19], generalpurpose model weaving notations and tools [12,13] or even bi-directional model transformation languages such as QVT.…”
Section: Relating Models: Correspondencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model can be used for generating the abstract syntaxes of the individual DSLs in the corresponding language family, and especially, for creating explicit correspondence descriptions between the elements of the DSLs. Correspondences between individual viewpoint languages can be formalized with use of QVT, for example (Romero, Jaén, & Vallecillo, 2009).…”
Section: Functional Entity Intensionmentioning
confidence: 99%