2011
DOI: 10.1080/09603107.2011.605751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realized volatility and jumps in the Athens Stock Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In nutshell our results indicate that decomposition of realized variance in continuous and jump components enriches the volatility forecasting, and the long memory of volatility is largely coming from the continuous component and consistent with the literature (Andersen et al, 2007;Vortelinos and Thomakos, 2012).…”
Section: Volatility Forecasting: Realized Volatilities Jumps and Leverage Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In nutshell our results indicate that decomposition of realized variance in continuous and jump components enriches the volatility forecasting, and the long memory of volatility is largely coming from the continuous component and consistent with the literature (Andersen et al, 2007;Vortelinos and Thomakos, 2012).…”
Section: Volatility Forecasting: Realized Volatilities Jumps and Leverage Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The empirical literature provides strong evidences of presence of jumps in nancial assets/markets (Alexeev et al, 2017;Bollerslev et al, 2016;Lahaye et al, 2011;Todorov and Bollerslev, 2010). Andersen et al (2007), Corsi et al (2010) and Vortelinos and Thomakos (2012) suggest that accounting for jump in realized volatility modeling and forecasting using high-frequency data is important. Eraker et al (2003) and Bollerslev et al (2016) provide further evidence of signicant risk premia for the jump component (Bollerslev et al, 2016;Eraker et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a series of studies address the modelling and forecasting of realized volatility. (See, for example, Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard, 2006;Andersen et al, 2007;Forsberg and Ghysels, 2007;Corsi, 2009;Curci and Corsi, 2012;Louzis et al, 2012;Vortelinos and Thomakos, 2012;Xu, 2012;Souček and Todorova, 2013;Christoffersen et al, 2014;Iliescu and Dutta, 2016). Furthermore, the HAR-RV model has been 2 Also see, for example, Bessembinder and Seguin (1993); Chen et al (1995); Liew and Brooks (1998); Girma and Mougoue (2002); Motladiile and Smit (2003); Serletis and Shahmoradi (2006).…”
Section: Realized Volatility Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better approach is to use the realized variance (RV) Quantile forecasts measures that estimate the latent conditional variance more accurately by exploiting highfrequency intraday returns' data. Several studies document that incorporating realized measures in volatility forecasting models leads to substantial statistical and economic gains (Andersen et al, 2001a(Andersen et al, , 2001bAndersen and Bollerslev, 1998;Barndorff-Nielsen, 2002;Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard, 2002;Christoffersen et al, 2014;Fleming et al, 2003;Koopman et al, 2005;Pong et al, 2004;Vortelinos, 2013;Vortelinos and Thomakos, 2012;Sharma and Vipul, 2016b). Recently, Hansen et al (2012) introduced the Realized GARCH model that jointly models the conditional moments and the RV process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%