2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realized Laplace transforms for estimation of jump diffusive volatility models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The convergence rate of our new test under H 0 is of order n −1/2 when the jump component is of infinite variation, which is faster than that of all existing tests. The idea of the test is based on the realized characteristic function, which was introduced in Todorov and Tauchen (2012) to investigate the distributional property of volatilities at different time points; see also Todorov, Tauchen and Grynkiv (2011) and Jacod and Todorov (2014). With observable i.i.d.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convergence rate of our new test under H 0 is of order n −1/2 when the jump component is of infinite variation, which is faster than that of all existing tests. The idea of the test is based on the realized characteristic function, which was introduced in Todorov and Tauchen (2012) to investigate the distributional property of volatilities at different time points; see also Todorov, Tauchen and Grynkiv (2011) and Jacod and Todorov (2014). With observable i.i.d.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, they apply a similar nonlinear transformation of the SLT, which, however, is evaluated at a single u rather than integrated over a range, ufalse[unormalmin,unormalmaxfalse]. Our design is motivated by the GMM inference procedure for stochastic volatility models in Todorov, Tauchen, and Grynkiv (2011), who integrate the realized Laplace transform over a range to harness most of its information. In particular, we leverage a similar idea in the context of the SLT to achieve robust estimation of the spot variance.…”
Section: Spot Laplace Transform and (Co)variance Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It captures the empirical Laplace transform of the spot variance process over a fixed interval of time, thus preserving information about the characteristics of volatility. Since its introduction by Todorov and Tauchen (2012b), the RLT has been utilized, among others, to design estimation procedures for stochastic volatility models, for example, Todorov, Tauchen, and Grynkiv (2011); volatility density estimation, Todorov and Tauchen (2012a); inference procedures and tests for the jump activity index, Todorov (2015); estimation of option pricing models, Andersen, Fusari, Todorov, and Varneskov (2019). These methods, however, generally use fixed‐span estimates of the RLT as ingredients in long‐span inference procedures (Andersen et al (2019) use a large option cross‐section), imposing stationarity and mixing‐type conditions on the volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matching moments of the latter with that implied by a model provides for an efficient, robust, and often analytically convenient model determination and estimation of the volatility dynamics. This latter effort is far beyond the scope of this paper and is undertaken in a follow-up paper (Todorov, Tauchen, and Grynkiv (2011)) that applies the limit theory developed here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%