2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1687998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realized Laplace Transforms for Estimation of Jump Diffusive Volatility Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is strong evidence against the gamma or log-normal distribution, while the inverse Gaussian-implied by the class of nonGaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2001) with tempered stable increments-has more support. These findings are consistent with Todorov, Tauchen, and Grynkiv (2011), but in disagreement with Corradi and Distaso (2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There is strong evidence against the gamma or log-normal distribution, while the inverse Gaussian-implied by the class of nonGaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2001) with tempered stable increments-has more support. These findings are consistent with Todorov, Tauchen, and Grynkiv (2011), but in disagreement with Corradi and Distaso (2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…We also calculated these expressions based on the ARMA coefficients reported in the appendix of Todorov, Tauchen, and Grynkiv (2011), but the results differ and we suspect there are some typos in that paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2001), we specify the non-Gaussian OU process via its marginal distribution, which will be the inverse-Gaussian (which is self-decomposable and hence this is possible; e.g., see Sato 1999), with parameterization given in the previous subsection. It can be shown, for example, see Todorov, Tauchen, and Grynkiv (2011), that the Lévy measure of L t is given by…”
Section: Inverting Known Laplace Transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%