2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realization of High Thermoelectric Figure of Merit in GeTe by Complementary Co-doping of Bi and In

Abstract: GeTe and its derivatives have recently attracted wide attention as promising thermoelectric materials. The principle challenge in optimizing the thermoelectric figure of merit, zT, is the low Seebeck coefficient (S) and high thermal conductivity of GeTe. Here, we report a high zT of $2.1 at 723 K in In and Bi codoped GeTe along with an extremely high TE conversion efficiency of $12.3% in a single-leg thermoelectric generator for the temperature difference of 445 K. In and Bi play a distinct but complementary r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
189
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
189
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 38–40 ] Due to the similarly beneficial band structure and strong phonon anharmonicity with PbTe arising from the same chemical bonding mechanism, [ 41,42 ] comparable high peak ZTs ≈2 have continuously been reported in the system of GeTe. [ 29,43–56 ] One important difference between these two compounds is that GeTe undergoes the structural phase transition from the low‐temperature rhombohedral to the high‐temperature cubic phase at a critical temperature around 700 K. [ 57,58 ] The rhombohedral structure refers to a unit cell with parameters ( a = b = c and α = β = γ < 90°), belonging to the hexagonal crystal family. It can be regarded as a slightly distorted rock‐salt lattice along the [111] direction with a interaxial angle less than 90°.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 38–40 ] Due to the similarly beneficial band structure and strong phonon anharmonicity with PbTe arising from the same chemical bonding mechanism, [ 41,42 ] comparable high peak ZTs ≈2 have continuously been reported in the system of GeTe. [ 29,43–56 ] One important difference between these two compounds is that GeTe undergoes the structural phase transition from the low‐temperature rhombohedral to the high‐temperature cubic phase at a critical temperature around 700 K. [ 57,58 ] The rhombohedral structure refers to a unit cell with parameters ( a = b = c and α = β = γ < 90°), belonging to the hexagonal crystal family. It can be regarded as a slightly distorted rock‐salt lattice along the [111] direction with a interaxial angle less than 90°.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an open question whether this behavior is correlated to the significant Ge deficiency observed in our sample, since this anomaly is not reported in other works [5,42,43]. However, the aforementioned shoulder is present in other reports of the S vs. T curve [12,44,45] but it had never been correlated to structural features. We describe, therefore, a phenomenological relationship between crystal structure and properties that can be extrapolated to other GeTe-like materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Owing to their excellent electrical transport properties, the thermal transport of GeTe materials have been optimized to show a high-thermoelectric figure of merit, evaluated as zT = Sσ κ T, where T is the absolute temperature, S is the Seebeck coefficient, σ is the electrical conductivity, and κ is the total thermal conductivity [6][7][8][9]. The parent GeTe compound presents high-carrier mobilities and concentration [10,11], which are tuned by dopants such as In, Bi, and Sb, to reduce the carrier concentration to an optimum value in order to obtain high power factors and to reduce the lattice thermal conductivity by enhancing phonon scattering mechanisms [12][13][14]. This phonon scattering in GeTe is also promoted by domain boundaries due to the herringbone microstructure commonly found in the rhombohedral phase [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing Li + as a "pseudo-vacancy" might have created a substantial mass difference between the atoms involved, which can potentially disturb the lattice vibrational modes and retard the lattice phononic contribution to the thermal conductivity. Nanostructuring can also be a reason for suppression of lattice contribution, as SPS processing is known to create nano-scale inclusions, defects, dislocations, misfit strains, displacement layers, precipitates and micro/nano-porosity [33][34][35][36][37][38][39], all of which, depending on their sizes, are known to scatter phonons of different mean free paths. It can be noted that at around 673 K, there is a change of trend in both electrical and thermal transport properties (for both pristine and LiI-doped GeTe), which is an indication noting the structural transition from the rhombohedral to cubic phase (at ~673 K).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%