2014
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realization of global empirical model for mapping zenith wet delays onto precipitable water using NCEP re-analysis data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with recent studies, (e.g. He et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2014;Yao et al, 2014a). It may be explained by the fact that the T m on the pressure levels under the terrain of Antarctica (∼ 6 km) may contain large systematic biases caused by the extrapolation of actual meteorological records.…”
Section: Comparison With Ncep2 Datasupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is consistent with recent studies, (e.g. He et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2014;Yao et al, 2014a). It may be explained by the fact that the T m on the pressure levels under the terrain of Antarctica (∼ 6 km) may contain large systematic biases caused by the extrapolation of actual meteorological records.…”
Section: Comparison With Ncep2 Datasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Annual and semi-annual variations in a NCEP2-derived T m time series for a reference location can be detected using the spectrum analysis (Chen et al, 2014). Although simple sine and cosine functions have been widely used to model the diurnal variations of T m , few studies have been conducted to analyse the periodic nature of the diurnal variation in T m .…”
Section: Diurnal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2) Several global empirical models of Tm are established based on analyses of Tm time series from NWP datasets or other sources (Chen et al, 2014;Yao et al, 2012;Bohm et al, 2015). Tm at any time and any location can be estimated from these models independent of real meteorological observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%