2012
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2012)028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realizability of the Lorentzian (n, 1)-simplex

Abstract: In a previous article [JHEP 1111[JHEP (2011 arXiv:1108.4965] we have developed a Lorentzian version of the Quantum Regge Calculus in which the significant differences between simplices in Lorentzian signature and Euclidean signature are crucial. In this article we extend a central result used in the previous article, regarding the realizability of Lorentzian triangles, to arbitrary dimension. This technical step will be crucial for developing the Lorentzian model in the case of most physical interest: 3 + 1 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One question that can be asked is what are the generalized Lorentzian signature triangle inequalities for these Lorentzian simplices? One can show that the (4,1) simplex has its 4 time-like edge lengths completely unconstrained, provided its Euclidean tetrahedron is realizable, while the (3,2) simplex has its edge lengths subject to complicated constraints [34]. Thus, it is safe to say that the constrained Lorentzian configuration space is very different from that of the Euclidean configuration space in any dimension.…”
Section: + 1 and Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One question that can be asked is what are the generalized Lorentzian signature triangle inequalities for these Lorentzian simplices? One can show that the (4,1) simplex has its 4 time-like edge lengths completely unconstrained, provided its Euclidean tetrahedron is realizable, while the (3,2) simplex has its edge lengths subject to complicated constraints [34]. Thus, it is safe to say that the constrained Lorentzian configuration space is very different from that of the Euclidean configuration space in any dimension.…”
Section: + 1 and Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from a few works [11,13,14,15,16,12], the path integrals of Lorentzian simplicial quantum gravity have not been studied much in the past. 2 Because of the numerical sign problem, naive Monte Carlo simulations do not work efficiently in the Lorentzian as in the Euclidean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of gravitational path integrals defined in terms of simplicial spacetime configurations á la Regge [9] has a long history [10,11,12,13,14]. While previous works focused on the Euclidean theory, there has been a growing interest in the Lorentzian theory in recent years [15,16,17,18,19,8,20]. As in causal dynamical triangulation, the light ray paths on a piecewise flat simplicial spacetime configuration is obtainable, in particular using Lorentzian trigonometry which we illustrate in Section 3.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%