2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3404351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realities and Myths of the 'Triple Nexus': Local Perspectives on Peacebuilding, Development, and Humanitarian Action in Mali

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Guinote (2018) writes, “the purpose of humanitarian action is to save lives, minimize suffering, and protect the dignity of people … wherever and whoever they may be.” If this commitment to neutrality shifts to accommodate the priorities of other parts of the nexus, or is even perceived by conflict actors as being politicized, Guinote argues that some groups may be left out of reach, such as those less favored by authorities. Tronc et al (2019) make a similar argument: “In many operational environments, the perceived legitimacy of humanitarian actors’ aims and activities is tenuous. The ‘triple nexus’ can only succeed if … linkages do not lead to the perception … that humanitarian action has been subsumed by a political agenda” (p. 27).…”
Section: Background: the Triple-nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Guinote (2018) writes, “the purpose of humanitarian action is to save lives, minimize suffering, and protect the dignity of people … wherever and whoever they may be.” If this commitment to neutrality shifts to accommodate the priorities of other parts of the nexus, or is even perceived by conflict actors as being politicized, Guinote argues that some groups may be left out of reach, such as those less favored by authorities. Tronc et al (2019) make a similar argument: “In many operational environments, the perceived legitimacy of humanitarian actors’ aims and activities is tenuous. The ‘triple nexus’ can only succeed if … linkages do not lead to the perception … that humanitarian action has been subsumed by a political agenda” (p. 27).…”
Section: Background: the Triple-nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, "aid is often programmed according to sectoral silos." In addition, 132 Analysts have written that, due to the fact that "the humanitarian development aid architecture is strictly segregated, divided by mandates and rules that were originally designed to meet different kinds of needs," there is a risk that "this rigidity is hampering the aid system's ability to manage risks and rapidly respond to shocks and stress (Tronc, Grace & Nahikian, 2019 The other good example of the inter-sector collaboration for humanitarian aid and development sectors is the 3RP. The 3RP stands for Regional, Refugee, and Resilience Plan.…”
Section: Intersection Of Development and Humanitarian Aid And Triple Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been significant criticism of the Triple Nexus concept and its implementation. Humanitarian actors are concerned that integration with “peace” is a guise for securitised approaches and that they will be asked to collaborate not with peacebuilding actors but rather with militaries engaged in stabilisation and counter-terrorism (Tronc et al, 2019). There is also fear that powerful Western donors are pushing reforms to demonstrate cost-effectiveness in an era of public scepticism towards aid and to meet security rather than humanitarian or developmental objectives, principally stemming the flow of migration.…”
Section: The Triple Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%