Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/isbi52829.2022.9761655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realistic-Shape Bacterial Biofilm Simulator for Deep Learning-Based 3D Single-Cell Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantifications of minimally required annotations have been reported systematically for two‐dimensional (2D) but not for 3D problems (Falk et al, 2019; Van Valen et al, 2016). As an alternative to human‐annotated ground truth data, generation of synthetic training data was suggested (Hardo et al, 2022; Toma et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2020). Nevertheless, there is always a gap between the real and synthetic data, which only can be bridged with elaborate randomization approaches (Tobin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifications of minimally required annotations have been reported systematically for two‐dimensional (2D) but not for 3D problems (Falk et al, 2019; Van Valen et al, 2016). As an alternative to human‐annotated ground truth data, generation of synthetic training data was suggested (Hardo et al, 2022; Toma et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2020). Nevertheless, there is always a gap between the real and synthetic data, which only can be bridged with elaborate randomization approaches (Tobin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%