2019
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realistic scenarios of missing taxa in phylogenetic comparative methods and their effects on model selection and parameter estimation

Abstract: Model-based analyses of continuous trait evolution enable rich evolutionary insight. These analyses require a phylogenetic tree and a vector of trait values for the tree’s terminal taxa, but rarely do a tree and dataset include all taxa within a clade. Because the probability that a taxon is included in a dataset depends on ecological traits that have phylogenetic signal, missing taxa in real datasets should be expected to be phylogenetically clumped or correlated to the modelled trait. I examined whether thos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extant species make up 95% of bird species in our study, but strong biases still arise from the imbalance in trait distributions between extant and extinct species. These results add further insight into the general problem of sampling biases in comparative phylogenetic analyses (37,38) and highlight the need for better integration of paleontological, ecological, and evolutionary studies. Despite previous calls to restrict macroevolutionary analysis to species with genetic information (39), doing so could potentially lead to a greater bias if the excluded species represent a nonrandom sample of the total.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Extant species make up 95% of bird species in our study, but strong biases still arise from the imbalance in trait distributions between extant and extinct species. These results add further insight into the general problem of sampling biases in comparative phylogenetic analyses (37,38) and highlight the need for better integration of paleontological, ecological, and evolutionary studies. Despite previous calls to restrict macroevolutionary analysis to species with genetic information (39), doing so could potentially lead to a greater bias if the excluded species represent a nonrandom sample of the total.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our taxon sampling is evenly distributed across the beetle tree of life, ensuring trait-state configurations (Table 1) are representative of the real distribution of these traits in nature. This is important because trait modelling approaches tend to be more robust when taxon sampling is evenly distributed across a phylogeny, even if this sampling is highly sparse (Marcondes, 2019). It is also noteworthy that rare trait-state combinations occur in nature and can reflect evolutionary instability of some trait configurations.…”
Section: Morphology and Phylogenetic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of phylogenetic signals can be distorted due to incomplete sampling of species and/or taxonomic oversplitting (Losos 2008; but see also Marcondes 2019). In both cases, levels of phylogenetic signal may be inflated because too many ecologically similar species cluster together in reconstructed phylogenies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%