1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8191(96)00093-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realistic parallel performance estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a multivariate analysis that tries to characterize the relations among the data. The difference with current work, such as PMaC [28] or PERFORM [12], is that they work with relational structures that are a priori chosen or have to be configured manually.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is a multivariate analysis that tries to characterize the relations among the data. The difference with current work, such as PMaC [28] or PERFORM [12], is that they work with relational structures that are a priori chosen or have to be configured manually.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first condition of Eq. (12) implies that X and Z should be related. The second condition states that X is only indirectly related to Z via Y .…”
Section: Deterministic Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even at this intermediate level though, all previous modelling techniques, such as those proposed by Adve [1], Mehra et al [20], Parashar and Hariri [24], Jonkers [16], van Gemund [27], Labarta et al [18] and Dunlop and Hey [12] fail to strike an ideal balance between accuracy, flexibility, implementation and evaluation costs (see Grove's thesis [9] for a detailed discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches). Even at this intermediate level though, all previous modelling techniques, such as those proposed by Adve [1], Mehra et al [20], Parashar and Hariri [24], Jonkers [16], van Gemund [27], Labarta et al [18] and Dunlop and Hey [12] fail to strike an ideal balance between accuracy, flexibility, implementation and evaluation costs (see Grove's thesis [9] for a detailed discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches).…”
Section: Previous Work On Performance Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PERFORM system developed by Dunlop at Southampton is an execution-driven simulation tool that uses a novel 'Fast Simulation Method' that attempted to improve the accuracy of prediction and overcome some of the problems with a full simulation of the memory hierarchy [10,14]. The model uses the "program slicing" technique to isolate the control variables and array indices of the source code, retaining sufficient information to simulate data movement within the memory hierarchy.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%