Real-world patient characteristics and use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-national study

Abstract

Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with significant morbidity and economic burden. This study aimed to compare baseline characteristics and patterns of anti-inflammatory drug use and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) use among patients with RA in Southern Italy versus the United States. Method Using Caserta Local Health Unit (Italy) and Optum’s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart (United States) claims databases, patients with ≥ 2 diagnosis codes for RA during the study period (Caserta: 2010–2018; Optum: 2010–2019) were identified. Baseline patient characteristics, as well as proportion of RA patients untreated/treated with NSAIDs/glucocorticoids/conventional DMARDs (csDMARDs)/biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) during the first year of follow-up, and the proportion of RA patients with ≥ 1 switch/add-on between the first and the second year of follow-up, were calculated. These analyses were then stratified by age group (< 65; ≥ 65). Results A total of 9227 RA patients from Caserta and 195,951 from Optum databases were identified (two-thirds were females). During the first year of follow-up, 45.9% RA patients from Optum versus 79.9% from Caserta were exclusively treated with NSAIDs/glucocorticoids; 17.2% versus 11.3% from Optum and Caserta, respectively, were treated with csDMARDs, mostly methotrexate or hydroxychloroquine in both cohorts. Compared to 0.6% of RA patients from Caserta, 3.2% of the Optum cohort received ≥ 1 b/tsDMARD dispensing. Moreover, 61,655 (33.7%) patients from Optum cohort remained untreated compared to 748 (8.3%) patients from the Caserta cohort. The subgroup analyses stratified by age showed that 42,989 (39.8%) of elderly RA patients were untreated compared to 18,666 (24.9%) young adult RA patients in Optum during the first year of follow-up. Moreover, a higher proportion of young adult RA patients was treated with b/tsDMARDs, with and without csDMARDs, compared to elderly RA patients (Optum<65: 6.4%; Optum≥65: 1.0%; P-value < 0.001; Caserta<65: 0.8%; Caserta≥65: 0.1%; P-value < 0.001). Among RA patients untreated during the first year after ID, 41.2% and 48.4% RA patients from Caserta and Optum, respectively, received NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, and cs/b/tsDMARDs within the second year of follow-up. Stratifying the analysis by age groups, 50.6% of untreated young RA patients received study drug dispensing within the second year of follow-up, compared to only 36.7% of elderly RA patients in Optum. Interestingly, more young adult RA patients treated with csDMARDs during the first year after ID received a therapy escalation to b/tsDMARD within the second year after ID in both cohorts, compared to elderly RA patients (Optum<65: 7.8%; Optum≥65: 1.8%; Caserta<65: 3.2%; Caserta≥65: 0.6%). Conclusions Most of RA patients, with heterogeneous baseline characteristics in Optum and Caserta cohorts, were treated with anti-inflammatory/csDMARDs rather than bDMARDs/tsDMARDs during the first year post-diagnosis, especially in elderly RA patients, suggesting a need for better understanding and dealing with barriers in the use of these agents for RA patients. Key Points • Substantial heterogeneity in baseline characteristics and access to bDMARD or tsDMARD drugs between RA patients from the United States and Italy exists. • Most of RA patients seem to be treated with anti-inflammatory/csDMARD drugs rather than bDMARD/tsDMARD drugs during the first year post-diagnosis. • RA treatment escalation is less frequent in old RA patients than in young adult RA patients. • An appropriate use of DMARDs should be considered to achieve RA disease remission or low disease activity.

The temporal association between adverse drug reactions and antirheumatic drugs utilisation in Western Australia: a retrospective study from real-world data (1995–2015)

“…Nevertheless, these drugs are often prescribed to those with severe autoimmune illnesses like RA, as the benefits usually surpass the hazards. The characteristics of patients, multiple medication uses, and drug responses can all modify how DMARDs respond adversely [ 33 , 34 ]. To avoid these risks, practitioners must monitor their patients and adjust their treatment [ 35 ].…”

Prevalence and Comorbidities Among Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Saudi Arabian Context

“…Aggressive treatment strategies aimed at achieving disease control, such as early initiation of DMARDs and biologic therapies, when indicated, have been shown to improve outcomes and potentially reduce the burden of comorbidities [ 31 , 32 ]. It is worth noting that while disease duration is an essential factor, the development of comorbidities in RA is influenced by multiple complex interactions, including genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors, and other comorbidity-specific risk factors.…”

Development and Validation of a META-Algorithm to Identify the Indications of Use of Biological Drugs Approved for the Treatment of Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases from Claims Databases: Insights from the VALORE Project

“…Without this information, researchers may face challenges in properly adjusting for confounding variables and attributing observed effects to the treatment under investigation. Specifically, this holds true for biological drugs such as TNF-alpha inhibitors, anti-interleukin, and selective immunosuppressants as most of these drugs are approved for the treatment of several IMIDs and IMID patients can suffer multiple IMIDs simultaneously, [13][14][15] thus making challenging the identification of the exact indication for the dispensed biological drugs. Despite several algorithms have been previously developed and validated to identify the most frequent rheumatic, dermatological and gastrointestinal IMID individually in claims databases, [16][17][18][19] coding algorithm for the specific identification of the exact indication for biological drug users using claims databases, has not been developed so far.…”