2018
DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Alk-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Crizotinib

Abstract: Background Crizotinib has shown greater efficacy in clinical trials than chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(48 reference statements)
8
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to results from previously conducted studies of real‐world treatment patterns for ALK + NSCLC [25, 26, 36–39], we found that crizotinib was the most commonly prescribed first‐line ALK TKI therapy in clinical practice. In the second‐line ALK TKI setting (post crizotinib), our results showed that ceritinib was the most commonly prescribed therapy, which is consistent with the approval timelines and similar to the results of other real‐world studies [24, 25, 37–42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to results from previously conducted studies of real‐world treatment patterns for ALK + NSCLC [25, 26, 36–39], we found that crizotinib was the most commonly prescribed first‐line ALK TKI therapy in clinical practice. In the second‐line ALK TKI setting (post crizotinib), our results showed that ceritinib was the most commonly prescribed therapy, which is consistent with the approval timelines and similar to the results of other real‐world studies [24, 25, 37–42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The rwPFS for crizotinib as first line of ALK TKI therapy in our analysis (6.64 months) is similar to the results of previous real‐world analyses (6.1 to 9.5 months) [24–27] but is shorter than the PFS reported for crizotinib in the PROFILE 1007 (7.7 months), J‐ALEX (10.2 months), PROFILE 1014 (10.9 months), PROFILE 1029 (11.1 months), and ALEX (11.1 months) clinical trials [3, 4, 6, 28, 29]. However, clinical and radiologic tumor assessment of rwPFS is allowed during a wide range of timepoints (e.g., every 8–16 weeks) and patient population is less rigorously selected, so we expected variation between the results of our analysis and results from clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We report a median OS of 31.0 months after initiation of crizotinib, which is comparable with the previous estimation of 33.8 months reported by the US retrospective observational study evaluating crizotinib in the first- and second-line settings. 10 However, the median OS time in these two studies was longer than the median OS time of 23.4 months in the retrospective medical record review conducted in the United States and Canada by Davis et al 11 Two hundred twelve patients were included in this review, and 65% of patients initiated crizotinib as first-line therapy. A majority of patients were men (69%), were current or former smokers (66.5%), and had not previously received other cancer-directed treatment (52.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, there was a report that the proportion of men was slightly higher than women (7). In addition, recent studies showed that 69% and 65.8% were male patients (9,11). Ke et al reported that the percentage of women was significantly higher in patients younger than 60 years compared to those older than 60 years (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because of the rarity of ALK-rearranged NSCLC, it is important to collect and evaluate data in clinical practice in addition to the results of clinical trials to evaluate its significance. ALK rearranged gene mutation is an oncogenic driver of NSCLC and commonly associated with younger age (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Although under a small number, however, elderly ALKrearranged NSCLC patients also have been reported (17)(18)(19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%