Real-world effectiveness of sotrovimab for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection during Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 subvariant predominance: a systematic literature review

Abstract

BackgroundEmerging SARS-CoV-2 variants have impacted the in vitro activity of sotrovimab, with variable fold changes in neutralization potency reported for Omicron BA.2 and subsequent variants. We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with sotrovimab use during Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 predominance.MethodsElectronic databases were searched for observational studies published in peer-reviewed journals, preprint articles and conference abstracts from January 1, 2022–February 27, 2023.ResultsThe 14 studies identified were heterogeneous in terms of study design, population, endpoints and definitions, and comprised >1.7 million high-risk patients with COVID-19, of whom approximately 41,000 received sotrovimab (range n=20– 5979 during BA.2 and n=76–1383 during BA.5 predominance). Studies were from the US, UK, Italy, Denmark, France, Qatar, and Japan. Four studies compared the effectiveness of sotrovimab with untreated or no monoclonal antibody treatment controls, two compared sotrovimab with other treatments, and three single-arm studies compared outcomes during BA.2 and/or BA.5 versus BA.1. The remaining five studies descriptively reported rates of clinical outcomes in patients treated with sotrovimab. Rates of COVID-19-related hospitalization or mortality among sotrovimab-treated patients were consistently low (0.95% to 4.0% during BA.2; 0.5% to 2.0% during BA.5). All-cause hospitalization or mortality was also low (1.7% to 2.0% during BA.2; 3.4% during combined BA.2 and BA.5 periods). During BA.2, a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization or mortality was reported across studies with sotrovimab versus untreated cohorts. Compared with other treatments, sotrovimab was associated with a lower (molnupiravir) or similar (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization or mortality during BA.2 and BA.5. There was no significant difference in outcomes between the BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 periods.ConclusionsThe studies included in this SLR suggest continued effectiveness of sotrovimab in preventing severe clinical outcomes during BA.2 and BA.5 predominance, both against an active/untreated comparator and compared with BA.1 predominance.