2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world analysis of manual editing of deep learning contouring in the thorax region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in some organs at risk (OARs), the results were systematically inferior and did not meet the clinical requirements of radiation oncologists. This agrees with previous studies [6] , [10] , [12] , [15] , [16] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in some organs at risk (OARs), the results were systematically inferior and did not meet the clinical requirements of radiation oncologists. This agrees with previous studies [6] , [10] , [12] , [15] , [16] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our overall positive conclusion regarding the clinical implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation is in line with recently published literature. Our study covers all clinically relevant sites, compared to more narrow studies for head-and-neck [6] , [10] , [12] , breast [13] , prostate [12] , [14] , thorax [15] , [16] , central nervous system [12] , or cervix [17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very few studies have clearly compared performances of AI-based auto-contouring against manual delineation [25] , or against inter-institution variations [24] . Reasonable editing is expected especially for CTV, at least in a fraction of patients, as already shown in other scenarios [26] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Disentangling the problem of inter-observer variation (IOV) from the accuracy of DLS tools is challenging, as the manual contour is the only “truth” available, and it is dependent on who has done the segmentation. With more and more DLS tools for OARs being used in the clinics, it now becomes possible to assess auto-segmentation accuracies in clinical practice [10] , [11] . By assessing the adaptations of the auto-contours, insight is obtained into where observers disagree with the DLS tools.…”
Section: Oar Segmentation In Hncmentioning
confidence: 99%