2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9914.2008.00423.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real Wage Cyclicality in Italy

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Pissarides (2009) summarizes the evidence of real wage cyclicality in the US and some European countries, finding wage to unemployment semi-elasticities being above 1 in the US case, although with large differences between job-movers and job-stayers. Results for different European countries also tend to find this semi-elasticity above 1, especially in the UK (close to 2 according to Devereux and Hart (2006) and Peng and Siebert (2006)), but also in Germany, Italy or Portugal 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For instance, Pissarides (2009) summarizes the evidence of real wage cyclicality in the US and some European countries, finding wage to unemployment semi-elasticities being above 1 in the US case, although with large differences between job-movers and job-stayers. Results for different European countries also tend to find this semi-elasticity above 1, especially in the UK (close to 2 according to Devereux and Hart (2006) and Peng and Siebert (2006)), but also in Germany, Italy or Portugal 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Results for different European countries also tend to find this semi-elasticity above 1, especially in the UK (close to 2 according to Devereux and Hart (2006) and Peng and Siebert (2006)), but also in Germany, Italy or Portugal 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Compared with males, wage shares of older females are much lower (1% to 6.6%), which may be related to lower statutory pensionable ages (SPA) for females (Carmichael and Ercolani, 2014). Italy still has the smallest wage share (1%) for older females, suggesting low labour participation of older workers (Peng and Siebert, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countries may adopt and utilise technologies differently, depending on their institutional regulatory structure and absorptive capacity in relation to the availability of new technology (Acemoglu, 1998;Lewis 2011). The rigidity of labour market institutions and employment protection have been offered as explanations for the persistently higher unemployment rate and lower skill premium in Continental Europe (Peng and Siebert 2008;Anger, 2011;Afonso, 2016). On the other hand, institutions responsible for relative wage rigidity in continental Europe also encourage investment in technology that increases the productivity of less skilled or older workers, thus implying relatively less skillbiased technological change in these countries compared to the US (Acemoglu, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%