2021
DOI: 10.3390/math9091016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Valued Systemic Risk Measures

Abstract: We describe the axiomatic approach to real-valued Systemic Risk Measures, which is a natural counterpart to the nowadays classical univariate theory initiated by Artzner et al. in the seminal paper “Coherent measures of risk”, Math. Finance, (1999). In particular, we direct our attention towards Systemic Risk Measures of shortfall type with random allocations, which consider as eligible, for securing the system, those positions whose aggregated expected utility is above a given threshold. We present duality re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(175 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore by Proposition 1(1), we know that Λ(X) and Λ(Y) are comonotonic. Consequently, by (11) and the comonotonic additivity of ρ 0 , we obtain that…”
Section: Structural Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore by Proposition 1(1), we know that Λ(X) and Λ(Y) are comonotonic. Consequently, by (11) and the comonotonic additivity of ρ 0 , we obtain that…”
Section: Structural Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These axiomatic approaches to systemic risk measures share more or less the ideas of Artzner et al [4]. For other axiomatic approaches for systemic risk measures, we refer to [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. For the dual representation results, we refer to [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, a concurrent approach would be to “measure the risk of each of the system components, and then aggregating the risks”. The difference between these two approaches is discussed thoroughly in Doldi and Frittelli (2021) and Biagini, Fouque, Frittelli, and Meyer-Brandis (2019) . Both approaches can be viewed as extensions of the basic theory developed in Artzner, Delbaen, Eber, and Heath (1999) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%