Real‐time visual‐feedback mask‐fitting during non‐invasive ventilation: <scp>A</scp> ‘technological’ gain over ‘human’ sensing?

Nicolini, Antonello; Scala, Raffaele; Cavalleri, M.

doi:10.1111/resp.13101

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Real‐time visual feedback during a mask fitting procedure reduced leak and improved mask seal, independent of the health professionals’ NIV experience . Whether this reduces complications over time is unknown . Nevertheless, strategies to optimize mask fitting, particularly for staff with limited skills in the area, are welcome.…”

Section: Sleepmentioning

confidence: 99%

Year in review 2017: Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary vascular disease and sleep

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Sleepmentioning

confidence: 99%

Year in review 2017: Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary vascular disease and sleep

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Nevertheless, technologies as pressure sensing visual feedback systems, 3-dimensional colour scan-based fitting assessment, and design of personalized fitting device between the face and the NIV mask [53, 54], objective measurement of pressure on the skin of nasal bridge during mask fitting [55] does not seem to have an easy application yet in the clinical practice [56]. Furthermore, humidification delivered by a heated humidifier [57] during NIV may potentially increase the risk of facial skin pressure ulcers as evidenced by the disrupting effect on barrier function of the underlying skin and associated trends in inflammatory response [58, 59].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Material and Technology: Back to the Future for the Choice of Interface for Non-Invasive Ventilation – A Concise Review

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has dramatically changed the treatment of both acute and chronic respiratory failure in the last 2 decades. The success of NIV is correlated to the application of the “best ingredients” of a patient’s “tailored recipe,” including the appropriate choice of the selected candidate, the ventilator setting, the interface, the expertise of the team, and the education of the caregiver. The choice of the interface is crucial for the success of NIV. Type (oral, nasal, nasal pillows, oronasal, hybrid mask, helmet), size, design, material and headgears may affect the patient’s comfort with respect to many aspects, such as air leaks, claustrophobia, skin erythema, eye irritation, skin breakdown, and facial deformity in children. Companies are paying great attention to mask development, in terms of shape, materials, comfort, and leak reduction. Although the continuous development of new products has increased the availability of interfaces and the chance to meet different requirements, in patients necessitating several daily hours of NIV, both in acute and in chronic home setting, the rotational use of different interfaces may remain an excellent strategy to decrease the risk of skin breakdown and to improve patient’s tolerance. The aim of the present review was to give the readers a background on mask technology and materials in order to enhance their “knowledge” in making the right choice for the interface to apply during NIV in the different clinical scenarios.

show abstract

Real‐time visual‐feedback mask‐fitting during non‐invasive ventilation: A ‘technological’ gain over ‘human’ sensing?

Abstract: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/resp.13074/abstract

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Year in review 2017: Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary vascular disease and sleep

Year in review 2017: Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary vascular disease and sleep

Material and Technology: Back to the Future for the Choice of Interface for Non-Invasive Ventilation – A Concise Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About