IEEE INFOCOM 2018 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications 2018
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2018.8486321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time Video Quality of Experience Monitoring for HTTPS and QUIC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
57
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, authors in [4], [9] use machine learning to predict QoE metrics of stalls, quality of playout and its variations using network traffic measurements such as RTT, bandwidth delay product, throughput and interarrival times. In another similar work [6] based on data collected in the lab, the authors use transport and network layer measurements to infer QoE impairments of startup delay, stalls and playback quality (three levels) in windows of 10 second duration. The prior works do not provide any estimation of the subjective MOS, rather they provide ML models for estimating the objective QoE metrics only.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, authors in [4], [9] use machine learning to predict QoE metrics of stalls, quality of playout and its variations using network traffic measurements such as RTT, bandwidth delay product, throughput and interarrival times. In another similar work [6] based on data collected in the lab, the authors use transport and network layer measurements to infer QoE impairments of startup delay, stalls and playback quality (three levels) in windows of 10 second duration. The prior works do not provide any estimation of the subjective MOS, rather they provide ML models for estimating the objective QoE metrics only.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our approach, we play out a wide range of videos (considering a case of YouTube) under emulated network conditions to build a dataset that maps the enforced network QoS to QoE. Prior works [4], [6] have shown good performance of machine learning in the inference of application QoS features from encrypted traffic (e.g., stalls and startup delay). However they do not provide any subjective QoE prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wide adoption of end-to-end encryption has turned previous DPI-based approaches unreliable or even unfeasible, motivating a surge of papers focusing on the analysis of innetwork measurements through machine-learning models. For example, in [3], [13], authors apply different machine-learning approaches to estimate QoE-relevant metrics for YouTube by extracting features from the stream of encrypted packets, using simple features such as packet times and sizes, or throughput. Similarly, authors in [14] follow a machine-learning-based analysis to infer QoE metrics for YouTube streaming over cellular networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this work is focused on continuous quality, the model only depends on the quality values of the last 15 seconds. [26] uses machine learning to predict initial delay, stalling, and video quality from the network traffic in windows of 10 s. The considered features are derived from IP or TCP/UDP headers only. ViCrypt [27] detects QoE degradations on encrypted video streaming traffic in real-time within 1 s by using a stream-like analysis approach with two continuous sliding windows and a cumulative window.…”
Section: Continuous Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%