1992
DOI: 10.1016/0164-1212(92)90047-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time systems design methodologies: An introduction and a survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following an accident, recovery of the "Black Boxes" is second in importance only to the rescue of survivors and recovery of human [5] remains.…”
Section: Flight Data Recordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following an accident, recovery of the "Black Boxes" is second in importance only to the rescue of survivors and recovery of human [5] remains.…”
Section: Flight Data Recordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As real-time software is reactive and concurrent, and its timing conditions are strict, it is difficult to design realtime software [1]. It is important to specify and verify realtime software [2]. In this paper, we propose timed weak simulation relation verification method based on timed automata [3], and apply it to stepwise refinement of realtime software over fixed priority preemptive schedulers [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, it is useful to distinguish between internal events and external events in the sense of process algebra [5]. (2)In real-time software, stepwise refinement is useful [6], and it is important to automatically verify whether the concrete specification refines the abstract specification. From the above results, we propose the followings:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DynBench permits workload to increase and to decrease dynamically, according to online user input, and according to user -defined experiment scenario files; these workload variations can be fully dynamic , i.e., they need not be constrained by timeinvariant statistical distributions. Another obvious distinction of DynBench is that it employs real workloads (with features similar to those described in [2,12,6,3,20]), instead of synthetic workloads, avoiding the problems of (1) obtaining a realistic synthetic workload and (2) accurately characterizing a realistic workload and its low-level data-dependent behaviors. Also, this has the advantage of allowing a user to "see" that the appropriate QoS is being delivered to the benchmark application system by observing its tactical behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%