2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real time structural modal identification using recursive canonical correlation analysis and application towards online structural damage detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The total damage indicator displayed robustness against different levels of noise with SNRs of 1 dB, 5 dB, and 10 dB inputted, but attention still needs to paid to avoid the significant environmental noise that was present during the experiment to obtain good identification results. 4 The proposed method has the limitations that the damage indicator was calculated based on two working conditions, where the structural design and boundary conditions were the same. At the same time, the result could only show the damage difference between the two conditions and one control working case needed to be chosen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 The total damage indicator displayed robustness against different levels of noise with SNRs of 1 dB, 5 dB, and 10 dB inputted, but attention still needs to paid to avoid the significant environmental noise that was present during the experiment to obtain good identification results. 4 The proposed method has the limitations that the damage indicator was calculated based on two working conditions, where the structural design and boundary conditions were the same. At the same time, the result could only show the damage difference between the two conditions and one control working case needed to be chosen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to overloading, environmental corrosion, material aging, operating loads, fatigue, and other unexpected events, engineering structures inevitably sustain different kinds of defects that can lead to structural failure. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a defect identification method to guarantee structural safety [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cluster analysis can be seen as an alternative approach because it does not require a prior baseline to perform feature discrimination, which is useful for the health assessment of aged structures, or for post-accident/post-retrofitting situations. Recent studies in damage detection have provided real-time solutions using recursive principal component analysis in conjunction with time varying auto-regressive modeling to successfully detect instantaneous structural damage [31][32][33]. As a recursive model updating approach, the Kalman filter (EKF) has been used in combination with various regularization methods to identify structural parameters and their changes in both vibration-and vision-based data.…”
Section: Damage Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the computational cost of these methods is still prohibitive for edge computing onboard low-power sensing nodes. Considering, e.g., the method based on recursive correlation analysis (RCCA) presented in [16], the most demanding part related to the eigenspace update has a computational complexity in the order of O d 3 per input sample, with d indicating the number of eigenvectors of the block covariance matrix of structural responses. Other recursive approaches are typically characterized by similar complexity [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%