Proceedings of the Conference on Tri-Ada '89 Ada Technology in Context: Application, Development, and Deployment - TRI-Ada '89 1989
DOI: 10.1145/74261.74303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time software engineering in Ada: observations and recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process continues until all deadlines of first jobs have been checked. Thus conditions (1) and (2) are sufficient for all subtask deadlines to be met.…”
Section: Other Subtask Deadlinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process continues until all deadlines of first jobs have been checked. Thus conditions (1) and (2) are sufficient for all subtask deadlines to be met.…”
Section: Other Subtask Deadlinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we have addressed the associated hardware scheduling support [10] [22], implications for Ada scheduling rules [5], algorithm implementation in an Ada runtime system [1], and schedulability analysis of input/output paradigms [7]. Finally, we also have performed a number of design and analysis experiments to test the viability of the theory [2,13].…”
Section: Cmu/sei-91-tr-6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, the concurrency architecture of a generic avionics system [131 was designed using the principles of rate monotonic theory. Additionally, an inertial navigation system simulator written at the SEI [1] Is an example of an existing system that was subjected to rate monotonic analysis and Improved as a consequence.…”
Section: Analysis Of Real-time Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described in [1], when a process preempts a lower priority process, the execution state of the lower priority process is saved and the execution state of the higher priority process is established. When the higher priority process completes its processing and relinquishes the CPU to a lower priority process, its execution state is saved and the state of the lower priority process is reestablished.…”
Section: Cmu/sei-90-tr-19mentioning
confidence: 99%