2008
DOI: 10.1002/acs.1077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real‐time signal processing for high‐density microelectrode array systems

Abstract: The microelectrode array (MEA) technology is continuously progressing towards higher integration of an increasing number of electrodes. The ensuing data streams that can be of several hundreds or thousands of Megabits/s require the implementation of new signal processing and data handling methodologies to substitute the currently used off-line analysis methods. Here, we present one approach based on the hardware implementation of a wavelet-based solution for real-time processing of extracellular neuronal signa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their efficient on‐line handling is guaranteed by the specific properties of the integrated circuit in terms of signal identification and computed final data output at a defined significance level. Although similar devices have been presented previously (Imfeld et al 2009; Jones et al 2011), they only worked off‐line and on considerably larger signals such as those recorded here. During the submission of our manuscript a similar electrophysiological approach was reported by Pfeiffer et al recording the effect of glucose on islets positioned on only one microelectrode of a multi‐array and using the fraction of plateau phase of the sustained bursting phase as the signal read‐out (Pfeiffer et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Their efficient on‐line handling is guaranteed by the specific properties of the integrated circuit in terms of signal identification and computed final data output at a defined significance level. Although similar devices have been presented previously (Imfeld et al 2009; Jones et al 2011), they only worked off‐line and on considerably larger signals such as those recorded here. During the submission of our manuscript a similar electrophysiological approach was reported by Pfeiffer et al recording the effect of glucose on islets positioned on only one microelectrode of a multi‐array and using the fraction of plateau phase of the sustained bursting phase as the signal read‐out (Pfeiffer et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The coefficients obtained are the result of subsequent high- and low-pass filtering of the spike waveform at j different scales (i.e., filter bandwidths). The spike waveforms can then be described with a vector v : where a − j is the output of the low-pass filter (approximation coefficients) at the j th scale and d − j , d −( j −1) ,…, d −1 are the outputs of the high-pass filter at each scale (detail coefficients) [ 40 ]. In this work, Haar wavelet has been chosen as the default wavelet option, thanks to its computational efficiency and similarity to biphasic spike shapes [ 5 , 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be highly efficient when combined with continuous noise estimation. It can be realized in real-time during acquisition even on large arrays (Maccione et al, 2009 ) and implemented in hardware, for instance using wavelet based compression and feature extraction (Imfeld et al, 2009 ). Once detected, putative spikes are then clustered according to spike shape parameters to separate multiple neurons recorded by the same channel and to exclude false positives (Lewicki, 1998 ; Einevoll et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%