2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.111401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time sensor fault detection in Tokamak using different machine learning algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…value of polynomial kernel is 2) (Hu et al, 2005), KNN (Yang et al, 2016b), and RF (Mohapatra et al, 2020). All the experiments repeated 30 times, respectively, and all the results are presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…value of polynomial kernel is 2) (Hu et al, 2005), KNN (Yang et al, 2016b), and RF (Mohapatra et al, 2020). All the experiments repeated 30 times, respectively, and all the results are presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, traditional machine learning (ML) methods have been widely used for fault diagnoses, such as the extreme learning machine (ELM) (Song et al, 2019), empirical mode decomposition , support vector machines (SVM) (Hu et al, 2005), KNN (Yang et al, 2016b), non-negative matrix factorization (Yang et al, 2016a), gray forecasting , learning vector quantization (LVQ) (Bassiuny et al, 2007), random forest (RF) (Mohapatra et al, 2020), and kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) (Navi et al, 2018). These methods can effectively extract fault features to a certain extent, but there are some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the authors in [ 13 ] proposed a context-aware intrusion detection system utilizing machine learning for a smart factory, and the study in [ 14 ] used an ensemble machine learning approach for disease diagnosis based on wearable sensors. The authors in [ 15 ] suggested an ensemble learning-based algorithm named Random Forest (RF) for real-time fault detection in magnetic position sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other ML methods, RF has the characteristics of low complexity, fast computing speed, high accuracy rate, insensitive to parameters, no need for feature normalization, less over fitting, etc. [37], [38]. Importantly, RF is more robust with respect to noise [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is more suitable to use RF when respect to a large number of data with reasonable features, especially under noisy environment. The literature [38], [39] has demonstrated that sensors fault diagnosis based on RF is feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%