Proceedings Second International Workshop on Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications
DOI: 10.1109/rtcsa.1995.528751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time scheduling of tasks that contain the external blocking intervals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrarily, a job of a self-suspending task may release the processor before being completed, for instance when waiting to get access to a shared resource or offloading computation to an external device, and continue its execution later on. In this setting, the classical critical instant theorem does not hold and related early results [1], [22] have been disproved, cf., [9]. Recently, a large number of additional results have also been reported to be flawed in [9], [14], [15], [31], showing that analyses for self-suspending task systems is non-trivial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrarily, a job of a self-suspending task may release the processor before being completed, for instance when waiting to get access to a shared resource or offloading computation to an external device, and continue its execution later on. In this setting, the classical critical instant theorem does not hold and related early results [1], [22] have been disproved, cf., [9]. Recently, a large number of additional results have also been reported to be flawed in [9], [14], [15], [31], showing that analyses for self-suspending task systems is non-trivial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous work for self-suspending task sets considered either Task-Level Fixed-Priority (TFP) scheduling or Earliest-Deadline-First (EDF) scheduling. For preemptive TFP (i.e., if one task has higher priority than another, all its jobs have higher priority as well), the work by Chen [8] (and its recent extension by Günzel et al [17] to arbitrary-deadline and arrival curves) dominate the other schedulability tests derived in the literature [1], [20], [22], [29]. For task-level dynamic-priority scheduling algorithms (where the priority of the jobs of one task may differ over time) only EDF (where the priority of a job is specified by its absolute deadline) has been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%